Can someone please explain why B is wrong? I am still confused. #help

It has been a few months... any chance we get to see this happen?

Agreed

I agree, I also did not choose the correct answer because of the "only if."

To echo the last messages on this thread, this is one of the harder lessons that I have encountered thus far. I think video explanations would be helpful in these lessons and in the conditional logic section as a whole. I feel like I am not grasping the concept only by reading and seeing visuals, and I am not sure how effective that is.

In previous lessons where we are relearning basic grammar skills, such as finding the subject and the predicate, we receive videos. Unfortunately, the more complex material, like this one, has no videos. It makes it hard to follow along when we are only reading lessons at this point and it is not ideal to try and move on to other lessons without comprehending these last ones first. #feedback

#help I am wondering the same.

#help

I am having trouble understanding why some of the examples, like 3.1 and 3.2 among others, are not arguments and am struggling with support. For example, for 3.1, here was my thought process:

'Human communication is a universal phenomenon that has existed across different civilizations over time. Linguists have conducted many comparative analyses of traditional languages from various regions and eras.'

Here, I thought the conclusion was 'Human communication is a universal phenomenon that has existed across different civilizations over time.' I used the 'why' and thought, well, because 'Linguists have conducted many comparative analyses of traditional languages from various regions and eras.'

Is there a way we can get a bit more explanation on why this is wrong and how we can identify where there is no support in an argument? Thank you!