A strategy that helps with a flaw question that is super tricky like this one is to think about what the main conclusion is. The answer will clearly invalidate the main conclusion. I chose E because it was the only answer that clearly makes me question whether most long-term friendships are in fact between two people near the same age.
#feedback it is confusing to me when JY edits the stimulus or answer choices to be correct in a different hypothetical. Makes the modules longer and hard to follow what we actually missed about the question right in front of us. Is it just me?
Got this one relatively quickly so I thought my thought process might help someone!
Argument: (In my own paraphrasing) Long term friendships are probably same age group because one is likely to feel comfortable approaching a stranger if the stranger is the same age, and most long term friendships start because someone felt comfortable approaching a stranger.
My first thought was well why couldn't long term friendships probably include people of different ages? The argument doesn't say anything about being uncomfortable approaching someone of a different age, just that one is comfortable approaching someone their age(not comparatively to any other age).
Not sure if this is the correct way of thinking but this made E jump out at me!
178 comments
A strategy that helps with a flaw question that is super tricky like this one is to think about what the main conclusion is. The answer will clearly invalidate the main conclusion. I chose E because it was the only answer that clearly makes me question whether most long-term friendships are in fact between two people near the same age.
@Catpop
it's okay to be wrong sometimes
real
I do not feel comfortable approaching this question, and there's no way we're going to be long-term friends.
LOL top comment!
Fuck my fucking chuengus life
I felt like my literacy went down after this question.
this one broke me... time for a break.
i dont like reading about friends whilst lsat studying.
#feedback it is confusing to me when JY edits the stimulus or answer choices to be correct in a different hypothetical. Makes the modules longer and hard to follow what we actually missed about the question right in front of us. Is it just me?
@griffinclairee631 Very difficult to understand this person whos speaks. Their voice is all over the place in speed and pitch.
are we deadass
what
I am not interested in having friends after all.
@CeciliaBurton1 lmao I didn't know we could add stickers/gifs on here, slayyy
brain rot
Why are the explanations so longgg
These last few are just terrible.
ya the writers of ts need to touch grass
Let's take a step back and ask....why? Why don't lawyers just talk normal?
anyone else tickled pink by the titles of the questions ever since “you try-intentionally harming a child”
i dont understand these kind of flaw questions with conditional logic:,( they're so hard
I didn't understand this one at all
18 minutes for a single question explanation? Can you please make it shorter? #feedback
Got it in 47 seconds.
I am HER!!!!
YES YOU ARE <3
This is the dumbest question I've encountered in my life. Law school ain't worth it
@spitfire-6 but it issssssssss worth it
Got this one relatively quickly so I thought my thought process might help someone!
Argument: (In my own paraphrasing) Long term friendships are probably same age group because one is likely to feel comfortable approaching a stranger if the stranger is the same age, and most long term friendships start because someone felt comfortable approaching a stranger.
My first thought was well why couldn't long term friendships probably include people of different ages? The argument doesn't say anything about being uncomfortable approaching someone of a different age, just that one is comfortable approaching someone their age(not comparatively to any other age).
Not sure if this is the correct way of thinking but this made E jump out at me!