User Avatar
swkoo90915
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
swkoo90915
Friday, Aug 12, 2016

@jhaldy10325 I was really struggling with time on LR and when I removed the time pressure, I actually finished the section in 30.

@jhaldy10325 Were you still timing yourself with a timer when you actually removed the time pressure? I am interested in your drill method because when I cut my section time to 30, I find myself rushing and missing some questions that I should be getting correct.

0
User Avatar
•

Monday, Aug 8, 2016

swkoo90915

30 mins per section

Hey guys,

I'm about to start taking sections with only 30 minutes instead of 35 to give myself more time pressure because

I found that 35 minutes feels a lot shorter during the test day. Has anyone tried doing this? If yes, what benefits

have you gained?

0
User Avatar
swkoo90915
Wednesday, Aug 3, 2016

Thanks guys!

0
User Avatar
•

Tuesday, Aug 2, 2016

swkoo90915

recording

I want to videotape myself taking PTs to get a better sense of my test taking strategy.

How do you guys do it?

0
PrepTests ·
PT142.S4.Q15
User Avatar
swkoo90915
Sunday, May 22, 2016

Can this question be represented in "Lawgic"?

SEG = Stimulate Economic Growth // IRL = Interest Rate Lower

Since "in order to" is a sufficient condition indicator, context gives us: SEG → IRL

But the Author goes SEG and further concludes IRL

Any confirmation or feedback would be appreciated.

0
PrepTests ·
PT127.S3.Q9
User Avatar
swkoo90915
Tuesday, Apr 12, 2016

Did anyone get this question wrong because you were too caught up in the logic?

For me, A seemed attractive at first, but putting the answer choice into conditional logic gave me an invalid argument:

A → B (what answer choice A gives)

A

---------------

B

Clearly, answer choice (A) links up the two crucial elements, but I just want to hear different thought process that others had.

3
User Avatar
•

Tuesday, Mar 15, 2016

swkoo90915

PTC.S2.Q11 - translating into logic

In the stimulus, it says "A field of study is genuinely autonomous discipline by virtue of its having a unique methodology"

I translated that sentence to mean that IF a field of study has a unique methodology, THEN it is genuinely autonomous discipline.

But Superprep book explanation says "all that a field of study requires to be a genuinely autonomous discipline is a unique methodology" which I translate to mean that unique methodology is a necessary condition instead of sufficient condition.

I highly doubt that the Superprep book makes any mistake, but which translation is correct?

Thank you

0
User Avatar
swkoo90915
Tuesday, Mar 15, 2016

Thank you so much for your perspective @swkoo90915

0
PrepTests ·
PT133.S2.Q21
User Avatar
swkoo90915
Thursday, Oct 15, 2015

This question was very confusing at first, but now it seems clearer. So for MSS/MBT questions containing other people's opinion and author's opinion, we should always choose answer that states author's opinion because that is what must be true based on stimulus...correct?

0
PrepTests ·
PT131.S1.Q17
User Avatar
swkoo90915
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2015

I am seeking ways to solve this kind of question faster. I would like some feedback on this: is it okay to get rid of (A), (B), and (E) quickly just by looking at their conclusions that do not match our second principle's necessary condition?

0
PrepTests ·
PT115.S4.Q15
User Avatar
swkoo90915
Wednesday, Jul 22, 2015

what would be a point of view opposite to Ruth's in this case?

0
PrepTests ·
PT106.S3.Q26
User Avatar
swkoo90915
Monday, Jun 15, 2015

NVM...video answered my queston

0
PrepTests ·
PT106.S3.Q26
User Avatar
swkoo90915
Monday, Jun 15, 2015

can we consider this question to be related to "ad hominem" we often talk about in FLAW method of reasoning?

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?