User Avatar
swnam9086
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
swnam9086
Friday, Nov 28 2014

no, A-> B doesn't imply "B some not A", but it may. In other words, It might turn out that A->B and, simultaneously, that B->A, which means that "B some not A" doesn't follow. But it also might turn out that B is a circle in which A is just a subset of B, which would mean that There are some B's that are not As. Do you get it?

User Avatar
swnam9086
Wednesday, Nov 25 2015

Thanks guys!

User Avatar
swnam9086
Tuesday, Nov 25 2014

Go to print setting and select "actual size", not "fit". I don't share the problem that you have when I do this.

User Avatar

Monday, Nov 23 2015

swnam9086

PT 76 anyone?

Dear fellow 7sagers,

The upcoming test will be my third and so last LSAT I'll be taking before I apply to law schools.

But there is a problem, namely, that I can't locate PT 76 anywhere.

I've taken all the PTs besides 75 and 76 and it's really important to me that I take PT 76 before test date.

Do any of you guys know where I might get it? If it is the case that it hasn't been published, do you know when it might become available?

Thanks!

PrepTests ·
PT137.S2.Q22
User Avatar
swnam9086
Thursday, Nov 20 2014

This may sound silly, but I fell for C because I thought that "Most of the commonplace beliefs of most people are true" was so remotely related to the main conclusion, and only somewhat better supported the last sentence. That is to say, I thought that C was right because the last sentence gives support for main conclusion, whereas the sentence before is just a premise for the last sentence, and not the conclusion. Does my reasoning make any sense, or should it be that since the "Most of the commonplace..." sentence lends support to the last sentence, it should also be taken to give support to the main conclusion?

PrepTests ·
PT127.S3.Q3
User Avatar
swnam9086
Friday, Aug 08 2014

i didn't choose B because "primary" seemed like a stretch. that is, if "primary prerequisite" was replaced by "one of the prerequisites" I would have very well chosen B. i don't really see how Jon's takes "Adam has no experience in critiquing essays" to indicate that "primary" is implied.

coming to think of it, isn't B right because stretching is ok for sufficient assumption questions? because there is nothing doing more than closing the gap in an argument so long as the gap is closed. wouldn't that be a better explanation?

maybe i'm being a little grumpy.. sorry..

User Avatar
swnam9086
Friday, Nov 07 2014

Thanks guys. I'll try your suggestions, except, I'm in Korea and I don't have access to a library with books from the U.S. lol.. but! I can try the cornell website. :) GL!

Hey fellow 7sagers, and a special hi to those in Korea.

I've taken the LSAT in June and got a 169, and am looking for a study partner or two who'll help me stay motivated (as will I to you(s)) for the upcoming December LSAT.

I believe that we could be most helpful to each other if you have at least scored a 168~169 on the real test and/or have been PTing in the 170s. (For those of you who'd like to know more about me: I have graduated from college in the U.S. and was born in 1990)

I'll be studying in Gangnam (Apgujeongdong) or Bundang. I work at a prep academy so I can provide space for mock tests.

hit me up if you're interested!

User Avatar

Monday, Nov 03 2014

swnam9086

Passages on Law

Hey, fellow 7sagers.

I'm having trouble with law passages in reading.

Knowing this, I now freeze when I see a passage about law.

Any advice on what outside material or reading might help?

I read the Economist and Scientific American, but they don't seem to provide much help in terms of

law passages..

Confirm action

Are you sure?