Subscription pricing
in title- lawhub not loading anything
PT Questions
tilakamita432
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
tilakamita432
Sunday, Aug 15 2021
@ said:
Just finished. I had LG-LR-RC-LG. The fourth game of the first section is particularly hard. It is a double layer sequencing game with a total of 7 questions (and I guessed on 6 of them lol). I hope this section end up being the test section.
also guessed on 6 out of 7 on this one and usually go -0 or -1 on LG sooo
tilakamita432
Sunday, Aug 15 2021
@ said:
Just finished! I had LG-LR-RC-LG
First LG felt a lot harder than the second LG, I didn't have enough time to finish the fourth game so I'm really hoping that is the experimental. I can't remember all the topics but I know that the fourth game dealt with Security Guards/Buildings.
LR seemed standard, nothing out of the ordinary. However, my alarm on my phone went off the last ten minutes and I had to wait until my proctor said it was okay to turn to it off.
RC wasn't too bad. I have the Nigerian Language/Literature, EMFs, Privatization, and the last one was something dealing with trees and Cacao.
Second LG was easy. Campers, Clothing/Retail, Clay Tablets, Musicians/Concerts.
(For those that only had one LG please comment what game themes you had)
I had the exact same test as you. Same 4 RC passages, felt the same about LR. I BOMBED the first LG section. that shit was impossible. second I finished w time to spare. Hoping the first was experimental.
tilakamita432
Tuesday, Jun 08 2021
Try the negation test! If something must be true, it cannot be false. So if you negate your answer and the argument falls apart, then that is your correct answer, bc it must be false in order for the argument to stand!
tilakamita432
Sunday, Aug 08 2021
It's NOT saying: Despite TT's food being average while Marva's is exceptional, TT is more popular.
It IS saying: Despite TT being more popular than Marva's, its food is average.
THAT is the discrepancy. When I look at it like this, D is obvious, as it tells us why TT's food is average. When I looked at it the WRONG way, I was drawn to E, which could tell us why Marva isn't as popular or more popular than TTs.
It's all about parsing out the argument and the referential phrasing correctly.
Hope this helps it "click" for someone else
tilakamita432
Friday, Aug 06 2021
D is wrong bc it says eventually. Our argument is talking about claims for the NEAR FUTURE. we don't care that eventually we'll outgrow our resources. we care about if we will have water shortages in the NEAR FUTURE.
tilakamita432
Friday, Aug 06 2021
Stimulus took a while to understand, but now I can see it more clearly. The last statement (the fact that Lopez won the actual election) tells us that more voters liked Lopez than liked Tanner in the general population. Then, because of this statement, the author infers (implicitly) that more people at the debate liked Lopez than liked Tanner as well. BUT the debate could have been a very unrepresentative sample of people as compared to the general population. Its not NECESSARILY the case that bc more ppl voted for Lopez in the election, that more people at the DEBATE liked Lopez. Maybe the debate was 50% 50% Lopez and Tanner supporters. OR, going further, maybe the debate was majority Tanner supporters. This is what AC (D) tells us, and therefore weakens the implicit assumption that the author makes in their reasoning.
tilakamita432
Sunday, Dec 06 2020
What helped me realize E was wrong was to imagine them responding to E with "ok then, we'll just ban poaching along w the trade". We can't make the assumption that banning poaching means leaving the ivory trade intact.
Same exact thing happened to me! My second LSAT score is exactly 2 points lower than my first, and nowhere near my current avg PT score. I want to take it again in August because I also don't feel June represented my abilities well. But, at the same time, I'm nervous the same thing will happen again, and on a 3rd retake, look even worse.