yes please.. super interested...
great job.. how did you approached most strongly supported questions?
hey guys,
So this game has 2 "if" rules as follows:
My confusion is from the the first rule. I understood that if George is presenting "J" then Rita is also included. But does it also means that if Rita is presenting "J" then so does George?
please help.
Admin note: edited title
The round game everyone is talking about, was it similar to game 1 of Lsat 1? I heard lot of people found it hard.
@ said:
@
I too did a double take with the mining LG reference once everyone started talking about it... did I miss something?! Then it hit me - you probably don't remember it because once you lay out the game pieces, the mining aspect basically disappears. It was more to do with months of the year than the underlying mining theme - hope that rings a bell for you - obviously can't talk the game-type and other specifics.
Lol yes, now I remember and thats exactly what happened. Mining got replaced with months. I think it was something to do with 2 locations and a head-office.
I am currently doing something similar to what 7sage suggested and I feel stupid every-time i find out what i did wrong. so basically i have 4 copies of same game and i do the first one as a timed section. lets say that you get 4/7 correct in the first game.I take 5 mins to read the games rules and regulations again and then again i start the game all over again in timed restriction. What I noticed that i was able to make the presumed assumptions better this time from the constraints of the game. usually by the 3rd time doing the game, i am sitting at 90% of correct answers. i just repeated the 3 or 4th time same game until i get 100%
I started noticing the mistakes i made which are usually not counting the sequencing correct or reading the question completely wrong ( my two main ones, stupid i know) but it's because i let the time get to me and i rush. I am now at 17 out of 23 and when I started a month ago i was sitting at 11/23 correct. I took a week and i just did games from the prep-tests i could find. this week i did 52 games in total and i see an improvement myself. Practicing is must. I find these games more fun than the other two parts of the exam now. i wish RC was this learnable. lol
I dont know if it made sense or not. I really hope it works out for you. good luck studying.
hey, can i join too. scoring high 150s. but i am really motivated to improve. would love to get some advice. I am ok with meeting online aswell if that is okay with you.
tina_gk@.com
thanks!
And Why don't I remember the mining question from LG??? was it the one from test takers who got experimental LG?
Ok, So some people had 2 LG sections (one being experimental) and some, like myself got 3 logical reasoning. I think I am silly for not knowing that experimental sections are not same for everyone. lol
can someone explain how close 7sage digital practice is in comparison to the real test please?
thanks!
@ said:
Do you mean only digital versions or also paper versions?
just digital. paper is not helpful anymore.
how many questions are in test bank in total? I see Logical reasoning has 611 in total. Thinking of purchasing additional access to more if available.
Thanks!
So, My request is that someone should do a new tutorial on how to approach the RC in digital form. Looking at Khan academy exams and 7sage beta, we know that we are using highlighting. But how do we utilize the memory method onto digital exams as we can't write little notes anymore. From Last yr or so, I am practicing for paper exam and suddenly there is digital form which completely throws me off when it came to RC. I hope there is a new tutorial on RC on how to best highlight the reading material.
Any chance that there is a package that offers tests only to buy and practice online at 7sage. If I can't afford the whole curriculum, I should still be able to practice on the new beta testing for online exams if that kind of package is provided.
Thanks!
Were there anymore than usual a type of questions for LR sections? Like flaw, NA etc?
@ said:
Hi! The two different mining locations are Grayson and Krona. The rule states there must be a visit to Headquarters in between any visits between G and K. Answer choice B doesn't contradict that rule. Headquarters is more like a home base, like, where the miners eat lunch or wipe the grime off. It doesn't count as a mining location.
I understand the HQ being like a home base.
Choice B is worded like this: Grayson in June, HQ in July and Grayson in August.
Rule # 1 states: team must work for at least one month at HQ between any two months working at "Different Mines".
My understanding for the rule is that different mines = K-HQ-G or G-HQ-K no matter is Grayson is stayed at 2 months in a row nor not. when making the switch to second location it has to be different than the first location and HQ must be visited.
I don't know if I am making sense or not. #help
PT 86 Game with mining. greyson, headquaters and krona.
rule one contradicts with the correct answer for the first question of the game. I looked at the explanation but it really don't solve my confusion.
"rule says that headquarters must be visited in between two different mine locations"
the answer choice B is contradicting the same rule. please explain may be i am reading it wrong. thanks!
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [first set of words]"
This game is kind of driving me crazy. I am looking at the first rule which states the following:
"the team must work for atleast one months at a headquarters between any two months working at different mines"
So my interpretation is that that Headquarters must come in between Krona and Grayson mines. My interpretations then contradicts the correct answer which is B as 'H' is coming between two Gs
how is that correct answer? please help.
thanks!
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q#(G#) - [brief description of question]"
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-86-section-2-game-3/
So I get that lsac is making 7sage take off all the game tutorials. Can we come up with videos without the test shown and just have videos with making of the game board. Is that possible?
Thnaks
Hey guys,
I have been prepping on and off for almost 6 months now with hard prep since past three months. I now score around 165+ on diagnostics. Should I take LSAT in Dec with that kind of practice marks or should I wait to improve?
Edmonton here.. Would love to join.. goal is 165 plus for U of A
Ok guys.. One of my LR section went very unpredictable meaning that I was second guessing my every answer for that section and time pressure did not help and now I am not sure if I should cancel the score or not. I just want to know if it's ok to do it. and if I don't, what are the consequences. I am a Canadian LSAT taker btw, considering the Canada schools only.
So I was doing games from PT 75 and up and the Pt 87,88 and 89 have games that are not the usual ones I was doing for practice. In order to be best prepared for games, are their any drill practice that i should do that can help me to prepare with recent style games?
Thanks!
ok. i was in the same boat. I tried this new trick. Since the exams are now digital. I maximize the font size and pretend that it is one paragraph. I hide the rest until i have the first paragraph fully grasped and then i move on to the next paragraph and do the same. My score has dramatically improved. May be it would work for someone else as well.
So I have been seeing a trend in my PT's about Logic Games for Replacement Rule Questions. Let's just say no matter what I do, I never get them right. And also find that those questions, for me at least, are time consuming. Can you guys share some tips or tricks which can help me get the answer correct and in less time?
Thanks!
So going back to prep 25 and up, I see a lot of games are more difficult and have more than 3 types of elements to account when solving these games. But more recent tests from 2007 and onward, games are not as hard as the ones i mentioned before. has it gotten easier in recent years or am i just not smart enough for the older exams and may see similar to older games in my upcoming lsat exam?
I have been dreaming that people are waving their piece of paper with their LSAT score in front of my face as they are walking past me. A sly smile on their faces. Let's just say sleeping isn't helping either. :(