I know you can filter to show only the most recent PT and drill data but I want to start fresh w a blank slate. Is it possible to wipe everything without having to manually delete hundreds of drills? If so is there a way to retain my notes and bookmarked questions?
It's important to be clear up front that just because something doesn't weaken the stimulus, doesn't mean it strengthens the stimulus. It could just do nothing.
@MJthelawya Did you ever find where your bookmarked questions went? I tried looking under Analytics> Questions >BM filter and it says "no practices found". I have bookmarked dozens of questions during drills :/
@Mina.G I think the main reason is C refers back to the same part of the premises as the stim does while B does not.
To match the stim, B should have said 'therefore Julie writes for a living'.
Even if B was a match, imo C would still be stronger bc it more closely resembles the stim- it compares unrelated things (drivers and tennis players; stims: good players and watch makers) while B compares similar things (writers, reading, novelists)....
tf does 'should fail your shallow dip' mean in explanations for A, C, and E?!
@Kevin_Lin I am super confused. The "Conjunction (and)" lesson says if AND occurs within the sufficient condition BOTH elements together guarantee the necessary condition. Neither alone is independently sufficient. The lesson even suggests "packing away the details" and translating 'red and blue' to simply "A"
...If red AND blue, then happy
...A > B
Both red and blue are required to be happy.
OR in the sufficient allows one element to independently trigger the necessary condition.
If red OR blue, then happy
...if I'm red, I'm guaranteed to be happy OR if I'm blue, I'm guaranteed to be happy
Can you please clarify?!
@Tumptytumtoes I omitted D for the same reason, and also bc it says before the new device was "first tested"
I also don't understand how in AC E it's described as incorrect bc 'we don't know enough about the frequency' couldn't the same be said about AC D?
I think another issue is the AC language "more efficient alternative". The stem only says the alternative is "significantly faster" which doesn't equate to efficient. Even if alternative is faster, it could still be completely inefficient.
Why can't all the claims be chained if they're dependent on each other (e.g. can't have one "without" the other)? I chained them like this:
Pursuing good life > integrity > freedom > law
...and got the correct answer by running contrapositive:
no law > no freedom > no integrity > no pursuing good life
Did I just get lucky?
When on my laptop none of the videos show the time in the play bar. They all just stay at 0:00. It would be helpful to know how long the video is before diving in. Also would be helpful to note time point of something you want to revisit so you can easily find it again without having to scan through the videos
'who cares about other companies' is why I figured A wasn't correct :/
Well apparently, it's a Google docs link:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kf-lyNIXT-NH4O8QSvIudtcI3_SHpWBEHfpJEYlW7ug/edit?usp=sharing
Anyone else not seeing anything besides "block.opendns.com refused to connect"?
Same here, but after carefully re-reading I can see those bastards intentionally used "out of province" to trick us.
AC says ...savings of $600M in ITS out of province expenditures... "its" referring to the province and 'OOP' being an intentionally tricky category of expenditure. For ex, if instead this said:
Province could keep its workers and use them more effectively, with a resulting savings of $600M in its education expenditures.
It becomes clear the AC is talking about the province itself.
TIL 'prerequisite' means necessary which really does not make sense to me :/