Moreover, the Coffee Shoppe can avoid a decrease in overall profitability only if its coffee sales do not decrease
If this is true, why isn't it true that the Coffee Shoppe can avoid a decrease in overall profitability by selling noncoffee products AND ensuring their coffee sales do not decrease.
Is there something that stops both these things from being true at the same time?
3
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I'm a little confused on this:
If this is true, why isn't it true that the Coffee Shoppe can avoid a decrease in overall profitability by selling noncoffee products AND ensuring their coffee sales do not decrease.
Is there something that stops both these things from being true at the same time?