#help - in the "Quantifier → Quantifier" section, it says "all → most," as in "all" implies "most," but it can't be the other way around ("most" does not imply "all"). That section gave the example of, "If it is true that all dogs like bacon, then it must be true that most dogs like bacon." BUT, in contrast to that, "Most dogs like bacon" does not imply that "All dogs like bacon." I am getting hung up on that, because I feel like all → most contradicts what is being said in this section here, that "most" has to come before "all." Can anyone please help clarify this??

So can you still fail one of the conditions (in this case, showing contempt) and it still be the right answer? #help

The only reason I didn't choose C was because I thought it was confusing sufficient and necessary??? How is it not?? #help

#help - the only reason why I didn't choose B was because "less than 92%" threw me off. The stimulus says that the unrefined Senegalese coins contained a gold content of 92%...not less than 92%. So how can B be right?

#help does the word "any" in answer choices A and B automatically make those answer choices wrong? Should we just be able to eliminate those options automatically based on that word alone? Just thinking in terms on time on the actual LSAT, that could be the quickest way to determine that those can't be the right choices... but I don't know if that's going too far...

Only reason why I picked A was because I thought the rest of the answer choices sucked and that B and E were too similar; just because there are "no known" cases doesn't mean that such cases could NEVER occur, right? Like there's a possibility that they still could, so wouldn't that make those answer choices somewhat weak? "No known" isn't necessarily definitive #help

For question 12, why can't we draw any conclusions about Sansa? I thought he cannot kill both Arya and Sansa, so if he doesn't kill Arya, doesn't that mean he could've then killed Sansa?

I did the chain like this: S --> / A --> / R --> J

Confused where Bran comes in as well, if anyone can help!

#help (Added by Admin)

The comma splice in answer choice C is driving me crazy

A good way to also think of answer choice A - satisfying the necessary is irrelevant; the sufficient could either fail or be satisfied in the case that the necessary is satisfied! So in regard to P→C, the some people who satisfy C could still not satisfy P. At least that's how I looked at it.

Love the Suits reference!!

I also struggled with logic games and was missing a ton like you were. It definitely took me way more than a month to get comfortable with them, so keep going! I just did a prep test and got my first perfect score on that section. My best advice is to do them over and over and over and over and over again, and take as many prep tests as you can. I was losing hope, but it slowly and surely came together for me, and I really credit that to consistently drilling the games.

If it helps, I ultimately chose E over B because the stimulus (sneakily) says, "this prediction is UNLIKELY to be borne out." Answer choice E reiterates such unlikeliness, as it specifically acknowledges that "global warming will PROBABLY NOT produce..."

This question is just mean