I got 10 seconds below the time since I knew it was a conclusion.... and answer A was the only one that states it was a conclusion.
I realize this won't work most of the time, but I have gotten many answers correct in this manner- but is this something I can rely on during the exam?
In the first lesson we talked about identifying the method of reasoning before jumping into the ACs. Here I think the method of reasoning is "Eliminating options or alternatives". I am not sure if it is necessary to do to figure out the right answer but it helps me a lot
How would we know where we can't use splitting the conclusion and premise descriptors method?... would it just be where u do not spot a P or C in the ACs?
I wanna make sure I am not going crazy with my reasoning for eliminating B. The conclusion of the passage is also regarding what event most likely WILL occur. B states the conclusion is an event will NOT occur. I saw "will not occur" and immediately crossed it out.
Isn't "only" overly inclusive in answer choice A? that was my pick but I didn't because of only. the stimulus does not use that level of certainity, even after the first event does not occur
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
34 comments
Am I doing this right?:
I got 10 seconds below the time since I knew it was a conclusion.... and answer A was the only one that states it was a conclusion.
I realize this won't work most of the time, but I have gotten many answers correct in this manner- but is this something I can rely on during the exam?
In the first lesson we talked about identifying the method of reasoning before jumping into the ACs. Here I think the method of reasoning is "Eliminating options or alternatives". I am not sure if it is necessary to do to figure out the right answer but it helps me a lot
The lesson did a great job of illustrating the previously discussed principle, thanks JY.
i did not read the choices carefully omfg
SUITS MENTIONED RAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
Still irked by the random and weird use of the word 'obtain' a few questions ago
I'm a little lost on this question like is B wrong because it doesn't encapsulate the conclusion?
How would we know where we can't use splitting the conclusion and premise descriptors method?... would it just be where u do not spot a P or C in the ACs?
Splitting the conclusion and premise descriptors definitely helped eliminate answers quicker
wow these MoR questions are the easiest of all, such a relief
I like the method of splitting the conclusion and premise descriptors. That was a very helpful tip for these types of questions.
This stimulus reminded me to log back into my other LSAT prep app (viz., Phoenix Wright: ACE Attorney Trilogy for Android)
If you wanted to make the first sentence a conditional in logic, how would you do it?
phoenix→/cartwright?
or /cartright→phoenix?
I have a feeling it is the second, but can anyone confirm?
pls #help
I wanna make sure I am not going crazy with my reasoning for eliminating B. The conclusion of the passage is also regarding what event most likely WILL occur. B states the conclusion is an event will NOT occur. I saw "will not occur" and immediately crossed it out.
Isn't "only" overly inclusive in answer choice A? that was my pick but I didn't because of only. the stimulus does not use that level of certainity, even after the first event does not occur
#help
Love the Suits reference!!