Implied
VC's that can't be detected by traditional culture methods (so are no infectious yet)
They cause infection
A) no, no conversation about human antibodies. Antibodies relate to being able to see them without a culture.
B) no, this is strong but right idea. There could be other ways they get woken up apart from temp since we do not know what wakes them up exactly.
C) no, no discussion of chlorination
D) no, no discussion of what happens when people have been previously infected (this might be what scientists had thought before Colwell's discovery)
E) YES, human body has something about it that would awaken these non infectious VCs
Implied/Stated
Something used in A that B would not think relates to autobiographies
A) Yes, A uses this principle while B implies this would be relevant. A mistake in an autobiography might be inclusion of something that did not happen, which B supports for its emotional implication.
B) No, both A and B would probably agree about this.
C) No, B would agree with this
D) No, while A uses this, B would not necessarily disagree
E) No, for the same reason (D) is incorrect. All we know about B is that the author supports lies in autobiography, not what kind of lies those must be
Stated - something relating to GZ's agricultural system
A) no, split time between low and high elevations
B) no, the opposite was said
C) no, there were extensive political controls
D) yes, cattle were used to incentivize workers to do dangerous mining jobs they would otherwise avoid
E) no, we know the agricultural system exploited a "enormous" area of land
Parallel Reasoning between cattle economy and size of population
The size of the population was enabled by the cattle economy
A) no, these are independent
B) yes, irrigation enables a farm in the desert (where it otherwise would not be
C) no, these are similar fields
D) no, one is hosted in the other
E) no, parts vs. whole
I wish there were some videos with a breakdown of how someone would solve it in real time. The instructor could pause the video and explain their reasoning and what they are looking at/for.
This would particularly be helpful for approach. The current videos are definitely helpful but the more condensed version would be perfect in terms of application of principles in a timed setting.
Unrelated idea, but it would be great if when taking a drill pulling from an answered questions pool, we could have the option to start with the questions seen the longest time ago.
I have gone through a lot of drilling and now want to go back and try the questions I had previously struggled to do.
When I try to do a drill with answered questions, it quite frequently will populate with questions I just had seen. For example, today when doing this drill type 2/5 were questions that had just popped up in the drill taken immediately prior.
This would be great for those who have been using 7sage for a while.
How on earth does "often credited with having anticipated not just subsequent developments in the arts" mean "the ability to anticipate later artists"?
It almost feels like a whole vs. part flaw. Like just because you can predict trends for an entire group of people does not mean you can predict what specific people will do.
I am trying to do speed practice to mimic the first 10 questions of an exam. I will choose Level 1-3 and not select any specific question type. In 2/3 times I have done this, the overwhelming majority of question have been from a singular question type. Defeats the purpose of the drill...
I would appreciate being able to filter my notes by all the Necessary Assumption questions or Conditional reasoning questions.
This would make reviewing and preparing for tests and practice much easier instead of scrolling thru.
This one was killing me because I kept looking for the flaw that just because a difference does exist does not mean that difference is essential.
I also like (E) because it clearly indicates a change that happened over a period of time, which is exactly what we have to reconcile.
@annnnna I would also argue that (D) is anti-supported. The most important consideration for modern bankruptcy laws is the public good as stated in the first sentence, not the creditors.
Would (D) be correct if it said "not possible" instead of "self-contradictory"
Would (C) be right if it said:
A laboratory safety check of a portable grill requires a week of uninterrupted testing. The new portable grill has been at the testing lab for a week, but the testing could not begin until the paperwork arrived three days later. Therefore, portable grill company should not release its product.
these were just hard words to understand