I would appreciate being able to filter my notes by all the Necessary Assumption questions or Conditional reasoning questions.
This would make reviewing and preparing for tests and practice much easier instead of scrolling thru.
I think I just don't know how retirement plans work.
This one was killing me because I kept looking for the flaw that just because a difference does exist does not mean that difference is essential.
I also like (E) because it clearly indicates a change that happened over a period of time, which is exactly what we have to reconcile.
Find the flaw in the answer choice describing the flaw lol
@annnnna I would also argue that (D) is anti-supported. The most important consideration for modern bankruptcy laws is the public good as stated in the first sentence, not the creditors.
Would (D) be correct if it said "not possible" instead of "self-contradictory"
Would (C) be right if it said:
A laboratory safety check of a portable grill requires a week of uninterrupted testing. The new portable grill has been at the testing lab for a week, but the testing could not begin until the paperwork arrived three days later. Therefore, portable grill company should not release its product.
For NA problems, it is important to enter the ACs with an open mind because it all too easy to force an answer.
I crossed out (D) because air pollution only enhances the El Nino. We have no idea if it links up to the causal chain. Maybe abnormal whether patterns are the main factor in causing an unusually strong El Nino that year.
I chose (C) but it is irrelevant because we are not comparing across institutions, we are trying to weaken the causal relationship between: acting responsibly --c-> retention of power for as long as possible
(C) would be right if it said: For certain institutions, the duration for which they retain power does not depend on social responsibility.
(B) is the right answer because it says this indirectly. It says for some institutions, the duration for which they retain power depends on the PERCEPTION of them being socially responsible. Not them actually being that way.
@sabby I think the rational is that the price without restrictions is the highest Company F could command on the open market. However, to ensure its citizens have majority ownership, Company F has to impose restrictions thus lowering the price. So:
Price with restrictions < Price with out restrictions
So either, Company F is selling at a price lower than what it could be selling. Or, selling at the right price but not ensuring its citizens with have a majority stake.
We are at a fork in the road, the left side has mud which would get my shoes dirty and I do not want to get my shoes muddy, we should go to the right.
I stopped reading (C) when it said A is more expensive than B fml
I could have gotten this faster if I thought more generally (e.g. product A vs product B) instead of product A vs better technologically advanced verion of product A.
common traps: sometimes these questions are really hard
I succumbed to recency bias here. Didn't see any AC relating to an impressionist approach, so got stressed and guessed.
@Deybomb17 I was 42 under
I laughed at (D) when doing this question. Laughed at it...
if you're reading this, you're studying for the LSAT
@erarabiameyer twice is not nice
same here so demoralizing