it's not useless at all, you'll figure this out when trying hard psar/mbt/mbf/sa/na questions.

ty!!

a......................

this passage was like walking through hell with no possibility of escaping

I got this one correct, but I wonder if A said "More people are willing to see a tv show more than once than are willing to watch a film show more than once." it could be correct, because it would hint that since less people are willing to watch it again, you would need more people to watch it

about A, would it be a necessary assumption? #help

could I have eliminated E just on the basis of having 2 proportional relantionships?

day 100 of saying "I love you, Kevin"

But if we add a difference (like when they started working) aren't we provide a competing explanation for why they are productive? That's why I chose B. But, I see that we would have to assume that working in the morning/afternoon impacts productivity, and maybe that's why it is wrong.

the question makes no sense, but then kevin starts talking and I can already see what's going on. I wish Kevin could read for me during the LSAT

this question makes me so angry lol

I agree. About C, I think maybe we should think about the paragraph too, to me, it seems like its purpose is to discuss the evolution of rights, with each "date" mentioned explaining a part of this evolution, so rather than just demonstrating the existance of a legal precedent, the reason for the fur treaty to be there is primarily to give this context. Do you think this is correct?

If letter D discussed a new interpretation of the regulations that followed the 1972 law, could it be correct? I still think letter E would be the right one, because the decision would have to go through the testimonies before it could come to a new interpretation. But I'm not sure.

"You’ve grown up so fast!" I HAVEN'T, BRING ME THE WHEELS AAAAAA (jk I understand it's time to be a LSAT adult..... sadly..........

If the conclusion and not the evidence were proven wrong, D would be correct, right? Because it would be proving an alternative hypothesis wrong, hence, strengthening ours

wouldn't this question be part of the "other's perspective" type of question? I see that "according to the passage" might lead us to stated questions, but it also seems like it could be part of the other's perspective type. Although I know that, in this case, it would be an implied question, so I'm confused.

q2, AC A has the greatest red herring of all time. I'm still speechless

I wonder if I could have an example of a mild disapproval. I got the question correct, but I'm afraid I won't recognize a mild disapproval if I see it.

"If someone spoke like this in real life, I’d nod politely and think about how soon I could leave the room." LOLLLLLLLL

the UVA dean is so coollllllll

it was not available before

I understand why E is not the correct answer here, but it got me thinking, would it be correct in a MSS question?

same question

humbled baaaadly

not silly at all! sometimes we are nervous and misread a lot of stuff, hopefully practice helps with this. wishing u the best :) we're in the same boat.