I'm in the same position score-wise. I'm going to try this tactic http://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/comment/7175 to see if it helps. I think the idea of trying to anticipate the answer choice really makes a difference in terms of attacking the answer choices because then at least you have an idea of what you're looking for.
I'm having the same problem. When I blind review a preptest I get around the 160s, but on the actual test I get in the 150s. When blind reviewing LR sections, should I go back and review the answers to all the questions or just the questions that I circled?
When blind reviewing a preptest, should I go back and review the answers to all the questions or just the questions that I circled? When I blind review LG I go back and do all the games and usually miss only -1 or 2 questions. Thanks!
I'm wondering the same thing...any input about this would be great!
Thanks for the suggestions @!
I'm in the same boat as the original post, so I am definitely gonna try and incorporate these strategies for the next two weeks.
Any more suggestions on this topic? I'm halfway through the course and am hoping to finish it before November so I can dedicate November to just PTs.
The same thing happened to me. I also started the diagnostic at 148, but after only three PT's I've increased my score to a 153, so I know that after a couple of more PTs it will hopefully continue going up. I think blind reviews are also a good confidence boost and a very valuable way to get to the nitty-gritty of why you think an answer is wrong or why it's right. I don't know if this happens to other people, but usually the more I blind review a test, the better I do in the next PT I take.
I would like to know the same thing. Any info on this topic would be greatly appreciated.
This is great! I'm going to try this this weekend.
Very inspiring! Thanks for sharing! Good luck tomorrow :)
True. I'm in the same boat. Thinking about Whether to postpone the test until February because I have a nasty cold. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
I'm in the same position. Weakening and flaws are the most difficult questions for me, too. Any tips from fellow 7sagers would be greatly appreciated.
I'm just going through the lesson on Valid Argument Forms now and I was wondering for which questions are the existential quantifiers relevant? I guess I'm just having a hard time visualizing how learning the different valid forms will help to different between Logical Reasoning questions types.
thanks for the suggestions @
Would it be useful to do all experimental sections as logic game sections? I'm starting full on PTS in the next couple of days and was wondering if integrating old game sections or redoing the ones we did during the course would be helpful. Kind of like re-enforcing the fool-proof method.
What a deal! Just got bought the bundle and Preptest 73 for under $7! thanks 7sage.
Thanks for the suggestions!