From the stimulus, I got two conditional statements:
1) knowingly brings about misfortune --> should be blamed
2) not knowingly brings about misfortune --> should not be blamed
But because of the "for example" part, am I supposed to add "could not have reasonably have foreseen it" to the sufficient part of the 2nd cond'l statement I wrote above?
Also, Can anyone please explain why (A) is wrong?
Can I interpret "it did not occur to Riley" in (A) as "not knowingly brings about misfortune?"
@
Especially, I definitely agree on the LG point. I got too complacent about it on the October test.
Thank you so so much for your advice!