Someone drop down and give Alon 50!!! Great explanation.
I seem to be confused on which questions types to expect Alternative-Reversal-Coincidence answer choices when dealing with a causal argument. Is this exclusive to Strengthen-Weaken questions? Thanks in advance for any help on this.
super frustrating
I'm almost at the month mark and feeling solid on fundamentals. hoping a month is good enough to put me in the 160s. Obviously don't have time to do all, so which PTs should I go through? 70s-90s? Any recommended PT strategies are appreciated.
Salute @gonzagaalyssa782!! Very helpful.
While I know this will not ensure the highest score nor is optimal, I'd like to hear from those ahead of me on which parts of the syllabus I can leave out and possible revisit if time allows. I would like to move to prep tests and running low on time before January.
In community. Thanks.
I agree Katherine. I have to continue to remind myself the questions prescribes for the "most" undermined. Likewise in STR, "most" true. We are not required to completely prove the argument, we'll leave that to Yu.
Is there somewhere in the Core material that reviews the common flaw types or does practice become our best tool?
Thank you.
#HELP
I'm in!! Please and thank you.
Hello 7sagers,
I haven't been doing much of the blind review. Precisely, what is blind review? Isn't blind review essentially the same as taking a practice test? Thanks
so we just make the assumption in D that "heavily invested" is the same as "reliance" in the claim being made #BS