im cooked

Reading the question stem mightve helped me out...

This is how I thought of the question, but I wasn't 100% how to formulate an explanation, so thanks for this. I thought this was a more obvious method of reasoning vs. the weighted average explanation in the video.

Tricky tricky

The lesson I've learned from this section is to trust my instincts more. I paused for a second and went "there is no most contrapositive" and then contraposed it anyways. :')

I don't think that it's bad, maybe you just needed those extra 10 seconds and a breather without a timer to get the right answer. Instead, I think it's better that you went back and corrected yourself, so you don't reinforce bad habits for future questions. Cheers :)

I understand that process of elimination is my friend, but it feels like for all these questions I am exclusively using POE. I look at an answer choice and go "no", and then cross it off. Even if, let's say, C is the correct choice on a question I will think "this is a good candidate for the correct answer", but I will still continue on to D and E to make sure they are incorrect. I just want to REALLY make sure I'm right, if that makes sense.

Is this bad? I feel like it wastes a lot of time. Does anyone have any tips for speeding up the process answer selection process?

Between the video examples and the skill builders there is a huge jump in the difficulty level. It would be nice to incorporate some LSAT-like questions into the lessons, or add more complexity into the lessons before moving onto the skill builders. I feel like I really understand the lessons, and then on the skill builders I'm somewhat lost.