I really appreciated this section, especially as a reminder that sentences can be incredibly wordy and complex-looking, though once broken down are actually just the skeletons of simple subject and predicate with a lot of modifying muscle added on. Of course, there are big, purple words whose meanings we can only infer from the sentence, but once a sentence is fully parsed out, these words become easier to understand, or better yet, their meanings become moot to understanding what the rest of the stimulus or the prompt is trying to say/ask! Once I broke down these sentences into their constituent parts, I was better able to understand and speed through the practice LSAT questions!

So wrong = /right?

Missed the could. :/

weaken EXCEPT. facepalm.

All three right, just need to work on the time. Rookie mistake.

1/3 right, but I know what I did wrong! For the first problem in the first sentence, I goofed and switched the necessary and sufficient conditions in my implies statement, which led me to pick A. Then for problem 2, I forgot that with the unless, the SUFFICIENT condition is negated, not the necessary. These would have been such easy fixes if I had thought for longer, but I figured I should try to stay under time. However, I'm thinking that it's best to nail the concepts near 100% before speed-runnning through practice problems like these.