69 comments

  • 13 hours ago

    got all 3 correct!!!! yay!

    1
  • Yesterday

    2/3. The Monster question got me

    1
  • 2 days ago

    3/3, Wohoo, I was struggling but it is slowly starting to click. It feels GREAT!

    1
  • That monster question made my brain feel like it was dying but I ended up with /physically dangerous and inspires revulsion -> horrific -> threatening which I don't think it was really right but got me there.

    3
  • 5 days ago

    2/3! I will take that!! We got this!

    1
  • 5 days ago

    got the last two right, but god the first monster question totally burnt my brain.

    1
  • 6 days ago

    [This comment was deleted.]

  • Wednesday, Jan 14

    1/3 first run 2/3 on BR even, though the last one is the easiest i somehow got it wrong.

    2
  • Tuesday, Jan 13

    I got 1 & 3 right. Made an oldest mistake in the book error on #2 but I understand it after review.

    2
  • Sunday, Jan 11

    1/3 on first try, then 2/3 on blind review getting 2nd question wrong.

    2 I understand why I got it wrong. I wrote out the conditions, because on blind review I picked B. Well if

    The guy is appointed --> polls are accurate BUT

    its invalid with the argument because:

    /polls grossly inaccurate --> slatter win --> appointed

    If we contrapositive:

    /appointed --> /slatter win --> polls grossly accurate

    DOESN'T WORK WITH CHOICE B:

    Appointed --> /polls grossly inaccurate.

    1
  • Saturday, Jan 10

    0/3 then 2/3, have to lock in CondR prep

    3
  • Edited Monday, Jan 05

    2/3, 3 got me but I understand the analysis.

    1
  • Monday, Dec 29 2025

    How do I access the explanation? It's not popping up for me.

    2
  • Edited Friday, Dec 05 2025

    #2 correct answer choice was so sneaky

    4
  • Sunday, Nov 30 2025

    these messed e up 0/3 lol

    13
  • Sunday, Nov 30 2025

    Tried to beat the time and ended up with 1/3. Blind reviewed with no time pressure 3/3. Got the concept but too slow still. :(((

    4
  • Edited Wednesday, Nov 26 2025

    3/3 let's go!! I was slow on them but that's alright for now lol

    7
  • Monday, Nov 17 2025

    2/3! Even though I got one wrong, I totally understand where I messed up. The video explanations are unmatched!

    9
  • Thursday, Nov 13 2025

    i got 0/3

    3 separate times lmaooooooo nice

    4
  • Wednesday, Nov 05 2025

    Why can't we build the skill first by practicing it rather than jumpt straight into a test question.

    You gave us 1 video on this

    1
  • Monday, Oct 20 2025

    For the first question how is the conditional chain supposed to look?

    1
  • Saturday, Oct 04 2025

    3/3? what the heck lol! I thought I got all of them wrong!

    5
  • Saturday, Sep 27 2025

    Challenging questions but managed to get them correct. Particularly, Question 3) tripped me up between answer choice A and D. Answer Choice A MBT-Correct choice: If the textbook contains an essay by Lind, then Knight cannot be in because Knight forces Jones to be in, which would break our rule of not all three. Jones is free to be in or out. This must be true of all worlds.

    D) Could be true. Incorrect answer choice

    This example is definitely a crafted question that can "throw off one's overall test-taking pace during a simulated Practice exam"

    Keep focus and keep practicing and reviewing LR questions. T-7 and counting!

    Good luck studying everyone and Oct exam takers.

    0
  • Friday, Sep 26 2025

    I got all three wrong I am having so much trouble. I feel like im over thinking but also not paying close enough detail bc im narrowing it down but picking the wrong one

    12
  • Wednesday, Sep 17 2025

    I got all three correct but speed seems to be a problem! Does anyone have advice for speed writing lawgic besides just practicing more? Also, any tips for remembering group indicators?

    1

Confirm action

Are you sure?