Okay maybe this is working lol not fully down on the concepts of when they apply but you can kinda cross out what you know won’t apply and juggle between 2-3 choices then down to 2. 3/3 (:
Equating Many to Some helped me. I did not look at the analysis fwiw, but I did get it correct.
Characterizations of work <-s-> Imprecise
(Some characterizations are imprecise)
Imprecise->/adequate basis for sound criticism of my work
(all imprecise characterizations are not and adequate basis for sound criticism)
Tie it together: Characterizations of work <-s-> Imprecise -> /adequate basis
From this we can infer:
Characterizations of work <-s-> /Adequate basis for sound criticism.
(Some (at least one!) characterizations of work do not provide an adequate basis for sound criticism. Some A are B. All B are C. therefore some A are C. B and C are essentially the same thing here. Imprecise and not adequate are one and the same, and we know that some characterizations are imprecise.
I got all three correct, however, my time on each was abysmal, especially the second one. about 2-3 minutes over time on each. I have gone through the course in order. Will speed come more quickly as I use my Lawgic skills more and more on real questions? Or does it suggest that I need to review previous units?
Yes!!! I can feel myself getting better at must be true!!! I struggle sooo much with them. 2/3 but I got #2 right on the blind review!! So grateful for these lessons!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Sorry, you need a subscription for that.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
93 comments
2/3. had to re-read number 2 a couple times to get it.
3/3... I am actually speechless because I used to struggle on some of these types of questions!
Got 3/3 and diagrammed each one. Even though I was way over time on every one but I was like 100% confident in 2/3.
many SUCCESFUL designers...
I keep missing questions because apparently, I am just not reading the question.
Okay maybe this is working lol not fully down on the concepts of when they apply but you can kinda cross out what you know won’t apply and juggle between 2-3 choices then down to 2. 3/3 (:
3/3 WOOO
2/3 but why are we not taught to diagram the macro aspect of these conditionals like question 3 does...
I got my first 3/3!!!!
Felt good about this one, 3/3
I dont understand question 1 - the analysis of it? Could someone explain?
@Cynthia.Martelli
Equating Many to Some helped me. I did not look at the analysis fwiw, but I did get it correct.
Characterizations of work <-s-> Imprecise
(Some characterizations are imprecise)
Imprecise->/adequate basis for sound criticism of my work
(all imprecise characterizations are not and adequate basis for sound criticism)
Tie it together: Characterizations of work <-s-> Imprecise -> /adequate basis
From this we can infer:
Characterizations of work <-s-> /Adequate basis for sound criticism.
(Some (at least one!) characterizations of work do not provide an adequate basis for sound criticism. Some A are B. All B are C. therefore some A are C. B and C are essentially the same thing here. Imprecise and not adequate are one and the same, and we know that some characterizations are imprecise.
my first 3/3, I should start moonwalking
All three correct
Some people are complaining about being a minute or two over. I was over 25 minutes…lol!!!! At least I was able to get them correct.
@ratman23 Same..sameeee.
I got all three correct, however, my time on each was abysmal, especially the second one. about 2-3 minutes over time on each. I have gone through the course in order. Will speed come more quickly as I use my Lawgic skills more and more on real questions? Or does it suggest that I need to review previous units?
my first 3/3 since I started this study plan!! took me way above time but im getting there haha
got all 3 right!! only issue is I went above on time for all three but I'll take grasping this over timing at this moment!
I got the two harder ones right -_-
2/3, got caught up on #2, I took extra time on #1 and #3 and I think I got in my head :,(
3/3 Baby!!! :D
3/3!! I was over time by a min on each one, but once I get faster this LSAT is gonna be cake in August if its in God's will
@JalenWilson Amen!
2/3 but i got the first one right on BR. my timing is also getting faster so heck yeah
Got all 3 correct, took me extra time but was able to get the logic down. WE TAKE THOSE
Yes!!! I can feel myself getting better at must be true!!! I struggle sooo much with them. 2/3 but I got #2 right on the blind review!! So grateful for these lessons!
LFG chat
I got all of them right!! With only about 30 seconds above the target timing for each!! Yay!!