Okay maybe this is working lol not fully down on the concepts of when they apply but you can kinda cross out what you know won’t apply and juggle between 2-3 choices then down to 2. 3/3 (:
Equating Many to Some helped me. I did not look at the analysis fwiw, but I did get it correct.
Characterizations of work <-s-> Imprecise
(Some characterizations are imprecise)
Imprecise->/adequate basis for sound criticism of my work
(all imprecise characterizations are not and adequate basis for sound criticism)
Tie it together: Characterizations of work <-s-> Imprecise -> /adequate basis
From this we can infer:
Characterizations of work <-s-> /Adequate basis for sound criticism.
(Some (at least one!) characterizations of work do not provide an adequate basis for sound criticism. Some A are B. All B are C. therefore some A are C. B and C are essentially the same thing here. Imprecise and not adequate are one and the same, and we know that some characterizations are imprecise.
107 comments
I thank God at this point honestlyyyyyyy. So proud 3/3
2/3 and I only went a few seconds over time. Progress >>>
3/3 all under target time let's gooo
2/3 on both reg and BR lol I only got the 3rd wrong twice but I'll take it
THREE'S KNEES! lezgo
2/3 and then 3/3 br WOO
2/3 then 3/3 br
3/3 first try LFG!!!!!
3/3!!!
i missed the last oen even though i took the same question before in a drill and got it right XD
3/3!! I'm so happy about this because I used to struggle so much with conditionals, but these lessons have made it so easy.
3/3 but I'm using way too much time on each question
2/3 then 3/3 in BR.... Getting somewhere. Some questions are def easier than others! Regardless of the listed difficulty...
When I read the explanations i get it, but in the moment im so lost!
2/3. had to re-read number 2 a couple times to get it.
3/3... I am actually speechless because I used to struggle on some of these types of questions!
Got 3/3 and diagrammed each one. Even though I was way over time on every one but I was like 100% confident in 2/3.
many SUCCESFUL designers...
I keep missing questions because apparently, I am just not reading the question.
Okay maybe this is working lol not fully down on the concepts of when they apply but you can kinda cross out what you know won’t apply and juggle between 2-3 choices then down to 2. 3/3 (:
3/3 WOOO
2/3 but why are we not taught to diagram the macro aspect of these conditionals like question 3 does...
I got my first 3/3!!!!
Felt good about this one, 3/3
I dont understand question 1 - the analysis of it? Could someone explain?
@Cynthia.Martelli
Equating Many to Some helped me. I did not look at the analysis fwiw, but I did get it correct.
Characterizations of work <-s-> Imprecise
(Some characterizations are imprecise)
Imprecise->/adequate basis for sound criticism of my work
(all imprecise characterizations are not and adequate basis for sound criticism)
Tie it together: Characterizations of work <-s-> Imprecise -> /adequate basis
From this we can infer:
Characterizations of work <-s-> /Adequate basis for sound criticism.
(Some (at least one!) characterizations of work do not provide an adequate basis for sound criticism. Some A are B. All B are C. therefore some A are C. B and C are essentially the same thing here. Imprecise and not adequate are one and the same, and we know that some characterizations are imprecise.
my first 3/3, I should start moonwalking