Not both rule

Lsatbreakingnews · 2017-09-10T22:28:16+00:00

Its skipping my mind right now, as I studied it before. But, in grouping games (not in/out) why do we use A -> ~B instead of A <-->~B for rules like A can't be added to the same class as B

akistotle · 2017-09-10T23:45:10+00:00

It really depends on the game. But you have to remember that A <---> /B indicates that either A or B has to be in.

"A can't be added to the same class as B"

If there are only two classes, then I think diagramming as A <---> /B is ok. But if there are more than two classes, then I would diagram as A ---> /B.

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

Related Discussions

Not both rule

Or Both, not BothIf Jays, Martins, or both are in the forest then so are Harriers. If J--> H If M -> H , according to JY we should split when "or" is in the s…

Logic Games : [Never Together/Always Together] v. [Not Both] Rule ConfusionHello, During In-Out Games, I am consistently getting confused between the Not Both Rule and the Biconditional (Always Together/Never Together) R…

is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?

Not both ruleIts skipping my mind right now, as I studied it before. But, in grouping games (not in/out) why do we use A -> ~B instead of A <-->~B for rules like …

Bi-conditional vs Not both rule confusionHi I was just wondering if someone could clear this up for me, because this confusion cost me quite a few points on in-out games, by making me hesit…

Comments