You’re prob not going to like my answer much, but with Flaw question types (both regular and parallel) improvement comes from exposure. Eventually you’ll just get really use to seeing what the flaw is right away and be able to either pick it, or find the argument doing the same thing.
Something that can help is to keep the question:
“Does it do this?” In your head. Once you spot the Flaw each AC you should be saying, does it do what the original stim did?
I know both of these are not really great solutions, but they do help. Especially exposure!
Comments
You’re prob not going to like my answer much, but with Flaw question types (both regular and parallel) improvement comes from exposure. Eventually you’ll just get really use to seeing what the flaw is right away and be able to either pick it, or find the argument doing the same thing.
Something that can help is to keep the question:
“Does it do this?” In your head. Once you spot the Flaw each AC you should be saying, does it do what the original stim did?
I know both of these are not really great solutions, but they do help. Especially exposure!