Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Flaw in Reasoning mistaking a sufficient for being necessary and vice verca.

kwoods15kwoods15 Free Trial Member
edited September 2013 in Logical Reasoning 28 karma
What does this flaw look like? Can someone point me to a certain PT or example?


  • CJ ShinCJ Shin Free Trial Member
    302 karma
    Check out PT59 Section3 Q22.

    This is a sufficiency-necessary confusion flaw taken to its extreme, and also a rare question that asks for double flaws. Always watch out for any sufficiency-necessary indicators in the stimulus and see if they try to do anything with it. But bear in mind that the harder ones cover them very well with heavy usage of abstract language and confusing sentence structures.
  • kwoods15kwoods15 Free Trial Member
    28 karma
  • Luis89011Luis89011 Alum Member
    48 karma
    PT 64 Sec 1 Q24
Sign In or Register to comment.