Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

pt 27 Game 3 Q 17 Help!!Hi, I was looking at PT27 and found out that question 17 in Game 3 seemed quite odd. The answer is "E" here but I did not understand why it is so. Th…
Help on LR Questions: 52.3.7; 53.3.8; 53.3.13; 54.4.9Hi everyone, <br /> <br /> I need some help on a few LR questions:<br /> <br /> 52.3.7: I initially chose B for this question because I assumed m…
PT 75 Game 1 vs. PT 75 Game 2these two games are a perfect example of why I get confused as to when I should set up my game board as a grouping sequencing game or a regular group…
Taking full-length PT or 3-part PT as practise for LSAT-FLEX?Ok, so I’ve just learned that the FLEX is only 3 parts (yay if you don’t have a lot of endurance). So far I’ve been taking full-length PT, expecting …
Please Help! PT 29 Game 2, Question 9-Really Good but Challenging GameThe rules of this game seem fairly simply yet there is an inference I'm not getting. <br /> The colors are Navy, Yellow and Red; the clothing pieces…

Help concerning rule for Game 3 PT 36

I say go go go Member

January 2020 in Logic Games 211 karma

I can't wrap around my head on the idea that the first rule implies that Guettierez MUST be on the aisle seat

It only say that Hoffman is behind guttierez aisle seat, and it would have been too risky to make an assumption that G is in the aisle only.

Show Related Discussions

Comments

Michael.Cinco Member Sage ⭐

January 2020 2116 karma

Just looked at it. Fairly sure the rules explicitly state both are sitting in the aisle.

or Register to comment.