Is LG -3/-4 considered good?

whatsmyname

Mostly its stupid mistakes, sometimes they're tough questions I wouldn't have time to tackle properly or do not know how to approach well (like rule substitution).

I'm writing this month. I've been studying for 6 months, focused on LR mostly and tackled LG about 2 months ago. I haven't been able to get -0 or -1 consistently, I'm lucky if I get away with -2, but I'm usually at -3 or -4. - and never any extra time to spare... I have no idea how people work that fast.

I'm beginning to doubt myself. Is this considered good? or am I doing average?

EagerestBeaver

https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/21627/our-free-logic-game-videos/p1

This link is to when JY said 7Sage was taking down its free LG video explanations more than a year ago. Included in that link is a graph of 7Sagers results from all three sections to show the most common score that 7sagers average on their analytics. -3/-4 is not bad at all. It would be above average for 7Sagers (and therefore likely better than the average LSAT taker).

LG tends to be the most learnable for many, but not all, LSAT studiers. You are taking the test this month and shouldn't freak out about not doing well. You are doing well. If you keep studying beyond this month, it is within your grasp to get it to -0/-1. Congrats on your hard work.

whatsmyname

@EagerestBeaver said:
https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/21627/our-free-logic-game-videos/p1

Thanks! Needed to see that