It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Before entering the PT's in the 80's, I used to blaze through the LR questions and would get -4/-5. Obviously, not perfect but a solid result.
But once I entered the 80's, my LR started dipping and I end up getting -7 to -9. I took a step back and tried to see what's going on.
I'm starting to find that a lot of the flaws and assumptions in LR in the 80's are still the same, but they are disguised with more convoluted language, both in the stimulus and in the answers. This has forced me to have to slow down now and really untangle the language in both the stimulus and answers now.
Is this something people have noticed or am I just going crazy? Lol.
I used to love blazing through the sections, but am wondering if I need to slow down now to attain accuracy on the more recent PT's.