Took super detailed notes so either I missed it in the course or it is not in there yet.
As follows: "Which one of the following would be most useful to know in order to evaluate the argument?"
They have a RRE feel? At any rate can someone point me in the right direction for these?
Comments
Let's say the argument says: A study of 1000 vegetarians shows that 50% of them live to be 75. Therefore a vegetarian lifestyle improves your chances of living a long life.
"Which one of the following would be most useful to know in order to evaluate the argument?"
A (wrong answer). What percentage of vegetarians live to be 90?
Whether it's 1% or 100%, this doesn't help or hurt the argument.
B. (correct answer). What percentage of meat eaters live to be 75?
If it's 20%, then that strengthens the argument. Looks like more vegetarians live longer
If it's 80%, that weakens the argument. The vegetarian percentage doesn't look so good anymore.
In my experience, the answer ends up being something that allows you to determine whether the authors conclusion is true or false (not with 100% certainty, but it either aids or harms the conclusion)
Like the others have already stated, a lot of these look like strengthen or weakening questions where they took the strengthening or weakening statement and turned it into a question.
Hope that makes sense. I think I edited this post about 10 times...clearly I was all over the place while typing it.