All Discussions
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Sign In with 7Sage
Register
Sign In with 7Sage
Sign In
Apply for Membership
Categories
All Discussions
Activity
Categories
33.4K
All Categories
28.1K
LSAT
17.1K
General
5.2K
Logical Reasoning
1.4K
Reading Comprehension
1.7K
Logic Games
70
Podcasts
191
Webinars
28
Newsletters
11
Scholarships
194
Test Center Reviews
2.2K
Study Groups
112
Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
2.5K
Specific LSAT Dates
31
November 2024 LSAT
18
October 2024 LSAT
9
September 2024 LSAT
38
August 2024 LSAT
28
June 2024 LSAT
4
April 2024 LSAT
11
February 2024 LSAT
22
January 2024 LSAT
38
November 2023 LSAT
43
October 2023 LSAT
14
September 2023 LSAT
38
August 2023 LSAT
27
June 2023 LSAT
30
Sage Advice
5K
Not LSAT
4K
Law School Admissions
13
Law School Explained
12
Bar
10
Forum Rules
641
Technical Problems
286
Off-topic
Related Discussions
Should I go back to LG Core Curriculum? Advice to get LG from -4-ish to -0 consistently?
I've taken the LSAT once so far and scored (what I estimate to be) a -3. On PTs, I generally get anywhere from -1 to -5, with an average of -4 in a n…
How to select an experimental section to add to a full PT?
Hey 7sagers,<br /> <br /> I'm wondering from what sample of experimental sections you guys select to simulate a real LSAT exam.<br /> Do you choos…
LG Foolproofing - Is it better to Foolproof the Core curriculum LG or the Newer LG?
Hey everyone just wondering what your thoughts are on this. Should I start with the early games or is it more beneficial to focus on FP the newer gam…
Help needed! How to improve from high 160s to mid to high170s?!
Thanks to J.Y. and 7 sage, my PT scores have improved from the low 160s to the high 160s or low 170s. <br /> <br /> But I have not been able to mak…
-2 to -4 Reading Comprehension, -5 to -9 LR Total, -4 to -9 On Logic Games (166-170 goal)
I think that my situation here is atypical. I think I studied all wrong, and I am unsure if I am screwed because of it.<br /> <br /> I am blessed i…
Looking to confirm experimental LG
2RARE2CARE
Member
February 2016
in
General
248 karma
I am currently reading the updated thread by Dillon.. But there seems to be contradictory answers. Was the floors 1-8 (game 4 of the section), the experimental? Thanks.
Show Related Discussions
Should I go back to LG Core Curriculum? Advice to get LG from -4-ish to -0 consistently?
I've taken the LSAT once so far and scored (what I estimate to be) a -3. On PTs, I generally get anywhere from -1 to -5, with an average of -4 in a n…
Excellent.Fondue
February 2021
Logic Games
How to select an experimental section to add to a full PT?
Hey 7sagers, I'm wondering from what sample of experimental sections you guys select to simulate a real LSAT exam. Do you choose them from earlie…
Bumblebee
September 2017
General
LG Foolproofing - Is it better to Foolproof the Core curriculum LG or the Newer LG?
Hey everyone just wondering what your thoughts are on this. Should I start with the early games or is it more beneficial to focus on FP the newer gam…
underdawggg
March 2022
Logic Games
Help needed! How to improve from high 160s to mid to high170s?!
Thanks to J.Y. and 7 sage, my PT scores have improved from the low 160s to the high 160s or low 170s. But I have not been able to make further im…
fiji12345678
June 2014
General
-2 to -4 Reading Comprehension, -5 to -9 LR Total, -4 to -9 On Logic Games (166-170 goal)
I think that my situation here is atypical. I think I studied all wrong, and I am unsure if I am screwed because of it. I am blessed in that from …
slabarge11
September 2014
September 2014 LSAT
Comments
inactive
Alum
Member
February 2016
12637 karma
Please discuss it in the official thread:
https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/6352/official-feb-lsat-discussion-thread
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/6352/official-feb-lsat-discussion-thread