This isn't how I imagined making an impression to the 7Sage community haha.
I decided back in January of this year (2016) that I was going to take the LSAT and use that as a gauge of determining if I should go to law school or not. After taking ten tests over two months (I have since lost the book, so I have no idea which tests they were) I saw my score hovering somewhere between 144 and 146. I decided to enroll into a course, and Test Masters came highly recommended. I dropped a paycheck and a half on it, and thought that I could get my score up in three months for the June LSAT. My goal was to score 160+ using their methods.
I'm not saying that the Test Master's method does not work. I will say it does not work for me. I feel as though I'm the worst person in the class (probably not though). Half the class is scoring well into the upper 150s and lower 160s. One individual is scoring into the 170s. Meanwhile... I've taken and scored the following on each of these tests:
PT62 (March 15, 2016) - 145 - No BR.
PT63 (April 16, 2016) - 144 - No BR.
*Introduced to 7Sage, thus BR*
PT56 (April 22, 2016) - 147 - BR 157
PT58 (April 27, 2016) - 149 - BR 159
PT65 (April 30, 2016) - 146 - BR 158
PT59 (May 2, 2016) - 144 - No BR Yet...
Honestly, just the Blind Review has helped me more than any amount Test Masters has. The BR shows me where I could be scoring if my mind was quicker to process the questions.
However, the last two tests have crushed my spirit. I thought it was a fluke, but now it's looking like an actual problem. With the June LSAT five weeks away, now is not a good time to be in a score dive. By now, I was hoping to be scoring into the lower 150s. I've already decided that I'm taking the June LSAT unless they cancel it, but I'm also prepping for the September LSAT as well. I may decide to just wait until next year to go to take the LSAT. I did not realize how difficult this test was to study for, and that I'm not able to get where I want to be within three months.
Unfortunately, nobody that I communicate with (save for my boss who is a lawyer, but he doesn't have time for my rants) on a regular basis understands the pains of the LSAT. They understand it's hard. However, they do not understand just how hard it is, and how much difficulty I have with it. Which is why I'm here - ranting to people who are studying for it just like me.
I know that I do need to do a BR of PT59, but I needed to get away from that test. I'll get the BR done on Wednesday. Tuesday and Thursday are Test Master classes, which are four hours long and take all of the time I should be using for BR.
I appreciate your good thoughts and listening to my rant. Thank you. I feel much better now.
Comments
Second, when did you start studying? Have you done the 7sage curriculum? If you haven't done the 7sage course, immediately stop taking PTs and enroll. 7sage is far superior to any test prep out there because they teach you the fundamental principals behind the test. Not to mention you get access to the explanations and analytics. It's a comprehensive approach geared towards understanding rather than mechanical formulas to steal a few points.
Obviously I don't know your personal situation, but what's the rush to take the LSAT? You can still apply next fall with a September score and December as a backup. Plenty of people do that. Additionally, the LSAT is far and away the most important piece of your law school application. A high score can literally be worth tens of thousands of dollars in merit aid.
My diagnostic score over a year ago was a 146. I know where you're starting. My last 2 exams have been over 170. It's a long process that takes a lot of dedication and I'm happy to give you more advice if you go into more depth about your situation
That being said, it’s important to not think of the LSAT as a 4 hour test. The LSAT tests you in much more important ways. Law schools aren’t trying to build classes of geniuses. They want to build classes of disciplined, hard working people who can overcome whatever is in front of them. The LSAT gives them an excellent gauge of this. The LSAT is an obstacle in your way and law schools are incredibly concerned with how well you deal with that. How high can you reach before you plateau? Do you have the wisdom to recognize when you’re ready? Do you have the strength to pick yourself up and press forward when you get knocked on your ass? Are you disciplined enough to keep hacking away even when you aren’t necessarily receiving any obvious, immediate results? The LSAT is designed to test these things as much as logic or reading or whatever it is Games are supposed to test. And it should, because these things are more important. This test is incredibly difficult and overcoming it is a major task. You can do it, you’ve just got to be smart in your approach and remember that the LSAT happens now, in your prep, far more than it happens on test day.
You got this!
Like I said, I started studying by myself back in January of 2016. The problem was that after taking ten tests over January and February, I didn't see a lot of improvement. Test Masters started March 15, and I haven't seen a lot of improvement there either. The short version of their study program consists of going over a type of question, and drilling it into the dirt with 60 to 100 questions of that type. I think it's a good course, but it's just not a good course for me. Their method of teaching is very formula based.
My personal situation is pretty good. I'm 27 years old, I've been working at a legal office for almost a year now, and I got my undergrad with magna cum laude honors and a 3.92 GPA back in 2012. The school I went to wasn't the best, but it wasn't the worst either.
It's nice to know that someone who was scoring similar to me is now scoring over 170. That gives me hope for the future.
Take a step back. Your GPA qualifies you for the best schools in the country; in the grand scheme of things, when you look back on your life and your career, a year won't make any difference at all. However, it could change the entire trajectory of your life if you take your time and take this test seriously. A good LSAT score is possible. My first diagnostic was 151 back in January 2015; with some thorough BR, 35+/- PTs and the help of this group, my last 2 (this weekend) PTs were 170 and 172.
Don't settle for a score that is way below your potential. Do not take the test in June.
I mean ok do what you want. But don't take it in June.
The short version of Test Master's study program consists of going over a type of question, and drilling it into the dirt with 60 to 100 questions of that type. They don't teach a general strategy for the questions. They just drill your weakest question type until you get good. They also use a method for diagramming and reviewing Logic Games very similar to 7Sage. I am not going to sit here and say Test Masters is horrible. I will say that I have seen very little improvement using their method. "That's all I have to say about that." -Forrest Gump
You are the first person to explain the LSAT to me in such a way. Everyone that I've talked to about the LSAT can be put into one of two categories. The first is they say it's the second most important test a lawyer ever take because it determines your school and how amazing you will be at being a lawyer. The second group says that, in the grand scheme of things, the LSAT doesn't matter because it doesn't stress what a lawyer needs to know to be successful (mastery of the law, business sense, and negotiation skills). Nobody has ever said that the LSAT is a gauge of determination. That's a new perspective on the test for me.
I can, however see a lot of good reasons NOT to take June.
If you score poorly you might get discouraged enough to decide "law school is not for me", seeing how that's one of your goals taking the LSAT. There might well be reasons why law school isn't in fact for you, but a disappointing score on the LSAT after a few months of suboptimal preparation shouldn't be one of them.
Even if you don't get discouraged enough to quit, you've wasted a take.
Plugging forward with your current strategy is likely to burn another 5-10 precious PT, with what's likely to be marginal improvement. Once you've used a PT, you can't make it "new" again, and new PT's are precious and rare commodities.
I don't know how good or bad TestMasters are, but I would be weary of a strategy that tried to teach me how to perform at Olympic level on the balance beam by performing an Olympic level routine over and over until I got it. Or died. I'd want to go with an approach that starts with walking and turning on the beam, followed by mounting and dismounting, and building upon those skills. Obviously I think 7Sage does a great job doing just that, so I wholeheartedly recommend it. And it has a great community to boot. The starter package contains all the lessons, and it's not going to break the bank. If you'd like a book format, Mike Kim's LSAT Trainer would be a good place to start.
No matter what method you choose, stop using PT's until you get some fundamental level understanding of the test and some solid drills from the earlier PT's.
You can do this - you have a 3.92 GPA, so you're likely at least either smart or hard working, but most likely both. Don't waste all that work with an LSAT score that represents your eagerness rather than your true potential.
I too took TM. My instructor was great! However, the methods taught didn't seem very efficient. Don't get me wrong, I liked the course, but I didn't love it. Focus your time and effort on 7Sage. Try to complete the curriculum in the next few months. Take a PT once you are done, and see where you stand.
If you're still not in the 160-180 range, find out what your weaknesses are. Go through LR and see which question type you missed the most. Check your overall LG and RC scores. Focus on your weak points.
Truth be told, my GPA is crazy high because I went from an associate's program at one school to a "completion" program at another. They took every grade as a "P" grade, which means it didn't count for my GPA. If they had, I'd be lucky if my grade was above 3.25 haha.
Getting back to the main topic though, you are right. There are a lot more reasons to not take the June LSAT than to take it at this point. It's a waste. I'm not ready, and I know I won't be ready in five weeks. Maybe I'll be ready by September, but I'm not going to register for any LSAT test until I feel ready the day I register.