Yes there is a difference since B --> C and B or C have different truth tables.
To get the contrapositive of A --> (B --> C) you negate the consequent, which is (B --> C) in this case, then flip the conditional and negate the antecedent, which is A.
So you get /(B --> C) --> /A.
The only truth value assignment which would give you a negation of B --> C is where B is true but C is false. So basically /(B --> C) --> /A amounts to saying if B is T and C is F then /A.
Comments
It’s different. A --> (B-->C) = A and B —> C
Contrapositive: /C --> /A or /B
Yes there is a difference since B --> C and B or C have different truth tables.
To get the contrapositive of A --> (B --> C) you negate the consequent, which is (B --> C) in this case, then flip the conditional and negate the antecedent, which is A.
So you get /(B --> C) --> /A.
The only truth value assignment which would give you a negation of B --> C is where B is true but C is false. So basically /(B --> C) --> /A amounts to saying if B is T and C is F then /A.