It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
So got my January score. I knew I bombed the LG section. I was prepared to think I'd failed miserably then. I got my score just now and I got one point lower than my November...so while bad, at least not as horrific as I was preparing myself for.
How badly will this affect me now that I have already applied?? I was doing this to see if I did better, to try negotiating for more money, if any is even offered....so no that's out the window. Do I do March anyway to see??
Comments
1) It has no effect whatsoever on your applications as it stands right now. Schools won't care much about a lower score, and certainly not a score that's only 1 point lower. So rest assured, you have done no damage!
2) That said, as you know - it obviously didn't help you either haha. Taking March is up to you. It will be too late for admissions purposes for the most part, but there's potential you could use a higher score for a last ditch scholarship negotiation. But I'd suggest only taking it if you have reason to believe you will score higher, of course (like, you are consistently PTing 5 points higher than your previous test).
Do you know if it'll have any impact on my chances of acceptance if the third score is significantly lower than the first 2 attempts?
@"Leah M B" thanks so much. Just reading your words, from a non-emotional perspective, really helped. I was worried since I'd already started applying, and am 99% sure I can't wait another year (I'm the one you wrote to once and suggested that and I explained my extenuating factors...).... so to know there's a minuscule chance that if I do really well in March -- since I haven't stopped studying -- I could maybe use that as a last ditch effort for negotiating is helpful. Would love to DM you about my thinking, however, and get more insight on your thinking because I believe you once said you did a cycle and applied -- and then waited and re-applied with better scores, etc. right?? I'm curious to how those decisions were made, why, etc. (if, of course, you're willing to share). Thanks!!
I can understand how frustrating this must be As cliché as this may sound, please know that you do not need to worry. I do not think that this will negatively affect your application.
Each exam varies, it may have either 100 or 101 questions which, of course, has an affect on the scale. I am sure that law schools consider the fluctuation. For instance, on the December 2007 exam (PT 53) a raw score of 78 converted to a scaled score of 162 whereas on the June 2008 exam (PT 54) a raw score of 80 converted to a scaled score of 161.
(Let's say this scenario represents your situation) The second score is hardly a reflection of your improvement. Although PT 53 had 100 questions and PT 54 had 101 questions, the truth is that you did correctly answer the same amount +1 (or +2) of the questions.
*sidenote: on 7sage's podcast featuring @"Cant Get Right" (Josh), he mentioned going through a similar situation. His first lsat score was 163 and his second lsat score was 162. (https://7sage.com/1-ama-w-7sager-cant-get-right-152-to-176/)