Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 33.5K All Categories
- 28.1K LSAT
- 17.1K General
- 5.2K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 70 Podcasts
- 192 Webinars
- 11 Scholarships
- 194 Test Center Reviews
- 2.2K Study Groups
- 112 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.5K Specific LSAT Dates
- 36 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 9 September 2024 LSAT
- 38 August 2024 LSAT
- 28 June 2024 LSAT
- 4 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 22 January 2024 LSAT
- 38 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5K Not LSAT
- 4K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 644 Technical Problems
- 288 Off-topic
Comments
I tried so hard to feign even the slightest interest. Didn’t work 😂😂😂
@nestbt01 the paintings or whatever was a real LG, but I think on reddit they're saying there was another "wall" game that was experimental.
Yep, I believe you're right.
Well this is discouraging, I had two RCs and was hoping the fish passage was experimental lol.
Can anyone with two LRs confirm there was a 25 and a 26
You definitely had one about the types of art on different walls? Maybe I was too vague. It looks like others are saying that was the experimental?
Same, man. I totally bombed the fish farms and felt like I did quite well on the experimental. Hopefully there is a SERIOUS curve
I definitely also bombed that passage. I actually don’t expect a serious curve. I felt like LR was very manageable. My guess is -11 if we’re lucky.
I was able to gather a lot of fish were being held in tight space and that allowed pathogens to spread among them more easily then one of them could escape and that is bad. But that was only the first part and this and took me about 3 min (minimum).
Can anyone who had two LRs comment the number of questions for them
I got the fish farming RC passage bulshit, and another RC that seemed way easier
@"Pride Only Hurts" I'm dying bc same LOL I was like is this really happening to me right now
Which LR section was experimental? I don't remember exactly how many questions I had on each of the three sections.
Did you have a LR RC LR LG LR sequence?
@leileiruiz I had two LRs; I remember Vitamin C, spiderweb/bird, killer whales, and cheetah.
@BairnOwl yes!
@Jane_lsat I had two LRs both with questions about Vitamin C. Last one with spiderwebs.
Apparently the first LR section is experimental, from what people are saying on Reddit.
@leileiruiz with 2LRs, also had school bus/one-way road.
@BairnOwl not sure if that's good or bad, I thought they were all difficult. Especially the last one!
does anyone remember anything bout a internet search query or something like that?
This was experimental as mine was LG.
Anyone know if the adjacent paintings / sculptures LG game was experimental?
It was game #4.
The other LG section was fairly easy. The last game was tough.
I BOMBED the sculpture game.
Yes! Word on the street is that it was crazy hard
Do you consider LR difficult? Was it similar to PT73,PT86, or PTs in 60s?
for those who didn't have an extra Logic Games, did you guys have one game with oil and watercolor paintings?
My average for LG is -.5 and I had 7 unanswered questions when time was called. That took a toll on my mental. Thankfully, break was right after this LG so I had time to convince myself it was the experimental. It seemed WAY too tough for an LG section. It wasn't even built up by easy games like the first 3 were on the real section either. LSAC did us dirty!!
The second LR I took was the first time I fully finished an LR section with time leftover to look at random questions after doing 2 passes. I don't know which one that was (substance wise), but the other LR was more difficult for me for sure. Either that section pressed my strengths or I was totally overconfident. I feel pretty good about it though, and that's pretty atypical for me.
Yes it was an strengthening question and was real
I had> @cassandrahastie3 said:
Honestly RC is my weakest section, but I could easily read the first 3 section and comprehend it. I am not good at details so I may have lost some detail oriented questions. comparatively speaking, it could have been more difficult.
my LRs were real and there was an assumption question in which a club was supposed to rent something and if they had rented it a week earlier they could have saved money and author's conclusion was that '' the club is not good at saving money ''
Don't mention the question type*
Just wana let you know so u don't get dinged by the admins
danger. You cannot discuss questions like this.
Did anyone with just one RC section have passages on Occam’s razor, a town called Brooklyn in Illinois, and one about the shift from marine to land based diet in Neolithic times? Or was this experimental
@minimite7 that one is experimental
Which was experimental for LG? I can’t remember all of the games from either... but here are 6/8 of them.
If anyone can fill in the last two blanks, as well as arrange them into graded/experimental, I’d be really thankful
I don't have that one, I have 3 LR, 1 RC and 1 LG.
Going to sum this up here folks! Lol.
Logic Games:
-The section that had the oil/water color game and the 3 days of the week (Thurs, Fri, Sat) was the REAL LG aka NOT Experimental.
Reading Comprehension:
-The section that had the Blues music/griot passage and a passage about fish farms was the REAL RC aka NOT Experimental.
I don't remember that either.
No, I didn't have that. I think it's experimental.
I was really upset that my test had a computer error on it. Did anyone else have this problem? Is this normal? It really has me questioning LSAC. If my test had a computer error can the LSAC answersheet possibly have a computer error on it too? And now I'm thinking they intentionally made the LR section (my strongest point) very difficult so that way people can retake the test. Seems like a money scam.
Reading Comp - What was with the feature of the question telling you to go to the middle of the paragraph to find something instead of giving you the line number? I do not recall ever seeing this before, is this a new thing?
102 questions on this test 🧐
@zacharysmith26 I noticed this as well but wanted someone else to bring it up just in case I was nuts. I think that’s in preparation for the Digital LSAT. Word on the street is there won’t be numbered lines on the paragraphs, so this was probably the phasing out of the question type.
@"Super Saiyan" I think that makes perfect sense. I noticed it, cursed the test makers for confusing me and didn’t give it a second thought.
@"Pride Only Hurts" Yeah, it was a tough section too on top of that. I am just remembering the courtroom witnesses passage from the test, and remembering that one being kind of hard now.
Was the RC section that had a passage about movies and their intended audiences the real one or the experimental one?
@BairnOwl @"shiri not siri" Did the RC section with a passage about fisheries also have a passage about movies and their intended audiences?