Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 33.4K All Categories
- 28K LSAT
- 17K General
- 5.2K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 70 Podcasts
- 193 Webinars
- 12 Scholarships
- 194 Test Center Reviews
- 2.1K Study Groups
- 111 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.5K Specific LSAT Dates
- 28 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 9 September 2024 LSAT
- 38 August 2024 LSAT
- 28 June 2024 LSAT
- 4 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 22 January 2024 LSAT
- 37 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5K Not LSAT
- 4K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 636 Technical Problems
- 285 Off-topic
Comments
That is so weird! Those were either in section 2 or 3 for me, and I believe that both of those are confirmed as real sections now. The primates one was about thumbs and lemurs and lower/upper primates as evolutionarily related.
@SuperMario929 Strange I dont recall a question about thumbs and lemurs. Maybe I dont remember it correctly
Had 3 LRs(1st, 3rd and 4th), the 1st one had 26 questions. So the second one( sperm whales, a sing zebra with b/w camouflage) and the last one (haunted house) which one was experimental guys?
So.... what are we all expecting for this curve?
is the LR with microeconomics and statistics courses as the 2nd to last question real? It was 25 questions. any one else have that? I als had LG LR LR RC LR
First time taking the LSAT; my center got the paper version. I had LR/LG/LR/LR/RC. I thought the third LR section was the most difficult so I'm hoping that it was experimental. Otherwise, I found the exam to be pretty straightforward? At this point I either did very well or very poorly.
I believe it was real. I had three LR sections but that question was in a section that I think is confirmed as non-experimental.
I had LG-LR(25)-LR(26)-RC-LR(25).
Don’t remember anything from the first LR section. Had a lactose intolerant question for the second LR, I think. The third LR had CFCs(?) and damage to the ozone layer, haunted house/chambers, Napoleon, and voting/wining campaign.
thanks> @SuperMario929 said:
thanks
This same thing happened to me on LG! I missed answering 2 questions because of it.
I’m expecting -11 or -10. But I guess the digital format might help it? Lol wishful thinking?
@"Pride Only Hurts" I was thinking that along with the possibility that many test takers taking it not fully prepared provided it's a freebie... was hoping -14 as that has been the case with more generous LSATs in the past 10 years haha
Does anyone know if it's true that all test takers(including the ones who take take the paper test) will get to see the score before canceling? Or does it only apply to digital takers?
@yz2686 All test takers!
Can anyone who had LG-LR-LR-RC-LR confirm which was experimental??
Edit: Looking like the second LR was in fact real. Seemed way harder than the others and I had to guess on 4-5. Ouch.
I am on board with this wishful thinking lol
I had the same format. LG - LR(25) - LR(26) - RC - LR(25). From what I have parsed together, it seems that the final one was experimental (Haunted House, Napoleon, voters and political parties as the final question).
On the other hand, I didn't think you could have scored LRs back-to-back with no break in between? Was that rule changed a while ago? Thanks!
I wasn't aware of any such rule, but generally it seems like when LR is experimental it breaks up the two real sections. So I'm a little surprised that the second LR was supposedly real.
Yes, it applies to all test takers. As per the LSAC, "test takers will have the opportunity to see their score and will have five days to decide whether they wish to cancel it. Those who decide to cancel will have the option of retaking the test one time free of charge in the 2019–2020 testing cycle, which extends through April 2020."
I had the same format of LG- LR- LR- RC- LR. I found a couple questions of the last LR (section 5) that didnt make any sense.
I’m going to post this because I’ve seen 3 different answers so far. LR (26) LG LR (25) LR (25) RC
For those with only two LR’s - did either have 26 questions?
Oh. That really sucks...the second LR was very challenging ;(
I had 3 LR sections and none of them had a question about rats or the thumbs of gorillas.
I had LR LG LR LR RC.
l
Does ANYONE concrete know the experimental section?
Had the same setup as @Vanessa and can vouch for those LR questions she mentioned.
Congrats to those who did well! I’ll be retaking in Sep!
Also had hard LR 26, normal LR 25 25. So much hope the first is experimental...
Who had the LR-LG-LR-LR-RC test? Did you find the 3rd LR significantly harder than the first two (I did) I am guessing that is the experimental one, hoping for confirmation.
@lizziea we had the same test. I found games to be super easy, LR tough and the 2nd RC passage awful
This was my first LSAT. Thank you 7sage. I felt very prepared and confident. I had the LR (26), LG, LR(25), LR(25), RC on digital. Found the first three sections very straight forward. I was shocked on the games how there really wasn’t any curve balls. I think it was the easiest game section on any test I’ve done. I thought the third LR after the break was extremely difficult. Way more difficult than the others. And the reading comp was by far one of the hardest sections I’ve ever done. can someone please confirm the experimental section? I’m freaking out a bit haha. Congrats everyone.
I had LR LR LG LR RC
The first LR was brutal.> @SuperMario929 said:
I had the same test as you!! I found the LR (26) the hardest as well; hence, I am hoping it was the experimental!
Paper Test @ Mobile Marriott Hotel in Mobile, AL.
LR, LG, LR, LR, RC (I think that was the order).
Fun fact: the 3rd party testing company that administered mine had NO idea about digital vs paper. I looked at the guy when he sat me down and i was like digital or paper? He gave me a side look and answered weirdly...paper? Guess they didn’t know the world was ending today. Needless to say I breathed a deep breath and knew I would be familiar at least.
I must say that the RC was incredibly difficult, especially the A & B one...my god I just gave up on that one and persevered. French one was a lot of inferences. Other two were straight forward.
LG was manageable, if you were able to figure out the set ups relatively quickly.
I found that all 3 of the LR’s were similar difficulty. Medium level of I had to guess, nothing TOO ridiculous.
I also had LG LR(25) LR (26) RC & LR (25).
Really praying the last LR was a real one!
But I can’t remember which questions were in which section.
I hope not. I was hoping the two 25 question were real and the 26 was experimental
Just dropping by to wish everyone the best! Remember you are NOT your score, and how you feel about how you did is NOT always accurate. The test is over and take some well earned relaxation time!!
I had LG, LR (26), LR (26), RC, LR (25). Hoping the experimental was the 2nd or the 3rd LR sections-- they were both pretty tough! the 25 question LR was fairly straightforward. RC comparative passage was insane. LG were really straight forward!
Someone answer this please!!!
Just dropping by to wish everyone the best! Remember you are NOT your score, and how you feel about how you did is NOT always accurate. The test is over and take some well earned relaxation time!!
If he had 2 (26) sections then it is confirmed that those of us who had 1 (26), that section was real
LG (wtf with Game 1?) LR, LR, RC (didn't think it was bad), LR (hardest; experimental?). Digital but NO stylus. Ziltch. Nada. Fingers only. Sweaty fingers. Boo. I had to poke at the screen several times to start each section and the highlighter didn't work as well, often highlighting words other than the ones I was going for...anyone think that's worth a formal complaint? Would it do any good? But I absolutely gained time by not having to bubble. I was somehow able to spend the final one minute of all 3 LR sections closing my eyes and breathing. It was the first time ever that I had a full Round 2 for RC, which took the sting out of it.I love that the passages weren't science jargon heavy. Hoping we can all discuss Game 1 at some point because it was my Achilles' heel. The rest of the Games weren't easy, but they made sense. Not being able to visualize and instinctively set up Game 1 had me totally frazzled.
jcr3ruvirginia.edu I had your test and I hate to be the bearer of bad news but from what I am reading some other people had two LR sections with 26 which would make our LR with 26 a real section.
Are you referring to the classrooms game with a rule like G cannot he next to P and another rule like: O_ _ P ?
LG,LR,LR,RC,LR.Second LR was 26 questions. The 26 question LR was hard and kinda unusual logic imo, I thought it was experimental when doing it.
**she
I had LG LR LR RC LR
To be honest, I just hope it's not the last LR. I don't really remember much from it, but I do remember the other LR. I had the fish leading question, acidic rain questions, universe questions, but no haunted house question that I remember.
Hey! I had 3 LR as well.
I also remember the Lemurs and primates, tulles, and acidic water.
I remember the trucks and insurance, but I don't really remember Napolean or haunted house. But I remember air pollution, so I'm confused if some of the questions overlapped or if I just forgot them.
My worst section was LR26 then... LR25:
And for the last game where, I placed the Q letter in 4 instead of 5. So I don't know how much that would mess me up...so upset with myself honestly.
Possibly. I remember ecosystems affecting well being, Philosophers and stable countries, but do not remember the British trade, haunted houses, or someone running for office.