Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

Categories

Went -1 on RC today.. fluke?

Taosage17Taosage17 Core Member
in Reading Comprehension 46 karma

I got -9 on my diagnostic, -2 BR. Today's -1 was from PT1. I'm wondering if it's just because of the passages that I was able to pull this off? Did anyone else find the passages from PT1 to just be easier...?

Show Related Discussions

Comments

  • T14_HopefulT14_Hopeful Alum Member
    56 karma

    I wouldn't worry too much about it. It's PT 1, which is ancient lol. And there might be some issues/differences for very early PT

    Just keep learning and practising!

  • _iamnw96_iamnw96 Alum Member
    437 karma

    I do find the pre-2010s reading passages easier, but that may be just me.
    Generally speaking, the average of your last 5 or 6 RC sections should be what you should rely on for data.

  • noonawoonnoonawoon Alum Member ⭐
    3481 karma

    I would consider earlier PTs unreliable for RC just because they don't have a comparative, and your real LSAT will have a comparative!

  • VerdantZephyrVerdantZephyr Member ⭐
    2054 karma

    With RC, each test should be approximately equal in difficulty as a general rule. I do not know much about the very early PTs, but as mentioned, averaging RC sections should be pretty accurate. Take a few more PTs from different eras and average the scores.

Sign In or Register to comment.