Advice I have seen around here is to begin with full proofing all games from PT1-35
NOT GIVING YOU ADVICE (I am nowhere good enough)
But I started getting solid fundamental understanding of each game type. Then I started at the easiest game type, basic linear, and am working to more difficult
I like the idea of mastering a game type first. I’ll do mixed sets later
I also recommend mastering 1-35. When I did this I also created a spreadsheet including each PT and labeled each game, and how I felt about it. There were some games that stood out in 1-35, that were particularly tricky for me, I think the Lizards + Snake game to name of one them. I would color code it, to note that it was difficult so I could come back to it later and retry.
Remember you can create your own set on Problem Sets tab so you aren't printing them and wasting paper! Good luck!
Comments
Advice I have seen around here is to begin with full proofing all games from PT1-35
NOT GIVING YOU ADVICE (I am nowhere good enough)
But I started getting solid fundamental understanding of each game type. Then I started at the easiest game type, basic linear, and am working to more difficult
I like the idea of mastering a game type first. I’ll do mixed sets later
I followed @Pacifico LG method and it was the best way (imho) to foolproof LG.
https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/2737/logic-games-attack-strategy/p1
I also recommend mastering 1-35. When I did this I also created a spreadsheet including each PT and labeled each game, and how I felt about it. There were some games that stood out in 1-35, that were particularly tricky for me, I think the Lizards + Snake game to name of one them. I would color code it, to note that it was difficult so I could come back to it later and retry.
Remember you can create your own set on Problem Sets tab so you aren't printing them and wasting paper! Good luck!