I just saw that there was a new video that showed a very good student working through an LSAT logic game in real time, with JY providing color commentary. (could you imagine a TV channel that did nothing but this?).
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-3-game-4/#comment-30736.
I also remember seeing
@"Jonathan Wang" doing an LR section in real time (25 questions in 25 minutes no less--- bows and incants “we’re not worthy!!” over and over again) on the boards, but I can’t find it anymore.
I think there are even more out there, but I’m having trouble finding them. Is there a way we can organize finding these videos in an easier fashion? I guess this is more of a question for LSAT Forum guru and all-aroung awesome guy, @"Dillon A. Wright”
I’m at a place now where I really understand much of the LSAT. I just don’t have the most efficient process to execute the LSAT in the time allotted. I think watching people knock it out of the park could really help.
Comments
I don't know how well this will help since most of the thought process behind LR questions is in the mind, as evident by how clean Jonathon's test is.
And/or, doing this to see how we actually perform from another perspective. I bet you actor types do this, @DumbHollywoodActor ? "What does my face really look like when I think I am looking scary ..." Etc?
I don't think we have an organized list of live videos, but here's a bunch for PT 37:
http://7sage.com/prep-test-37-logic-games-live-video/
To date we have full live videos (some with commentary) for PTs 23, 35, and 37.
PT 23's have two live commentary versions for Game 1. It's interesting to see the contrast b/t a medium LG performance and a high LG performance:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-1-game-1/
But he may have done this section before many times as instructors typically do. For a strictly fresh never-before-seen test, this is too blazin to be real
That said, I realize there's nothing I can do to prove any of what I just said, so you can believe whatever you want.
Looking at the section again - #1 is a very easy strengthen question, #2 is a main conclusion with a very obvious structure, and #3's answer choice sticks out like a sore thumb by mentioning the obviously irrelevant profit motive. I think a lot of 170+ scorers would be able to get through those questions in 90 seconds or so. It's the more difficult questions where mastery starts to grow the gap.
Yeah this recording is from May 2012 a couple of months after the test release which wasn't apparent. Earlier it had seemed that it's a new recording and since it's many years old PT, one would assume that people who teach the test on a daily basis would've seen these questions many times over.
You mentioned in the commentary on how you felt after the test in a different video () that you used POE on 11/25 questions. Does it mean that for the rest you simply circled the answer you thought was correct based on stim without confirming other answers to be wrong (topdown?) What level of confidence one needs to feel in the choice circled based on stim without checking other choices and moving on?
Looking at other answer choices to confirm that they are wrong seems to take a lot of time for me and leads to timing issues and rushing to finish the section at the end.
It'd be useful for many I think to see similar recordings for other fresh tests in LR and RC, like the june one that's going to be released soon.
Even when I go "top down", I confirm every other answer choice is incorrect. I suppose that means that I technically POE on every question, but as used in the video I meant that I wasn't able to immediately identify the correct answer choice my first time through. In other words, there was a non-zero amount of doubt on one or more answer choices that caused me to look back and run the logic again. I never use 'pure' POE and I think it's a terrible strategy and a crutch. If you can't justify your answer choice, then what basis do you have for eliminating the others? It might get you the correct answer, but that doesn't mean you understood the question or the logic underlying.
I remember recording this guy pretty close in time to 65's release, as part of an experiment in what a series like this might look like. I (perhaps wrongly?) assumed that nobody would be interested in what I perceived to be a relatively boring end-product video. So, it got backburnered as other things started to happen around PreProBono, 7Sage, and my own tutoring business. I only uploaded it to YouTube by request of a student, who was taking the June 2012 test and had just taken 65 as a full-length practice test (hence the May upload date). By now, you're 100% correct - I've seen a lot of those questions more times than I care to remember.
The last time this came up, I toyed with the idea of making more, but then I got busy again and never revisited the idea.
The lack of POE is a revelation to me, as is the cleanness of your test. In contrast, I mark up my test like a serial killer. So that is something I'm going to start drilling in the hopes of shaving time off of my process.
So I hope that you continue to make these videos, perhaps with a play-by-play audio done after the fact, like JY does, of your thought processes. I think they would be exceptionally helpful. Thanks.
LG | 23, 35, 37, 71
RC | 5, 6, 70
LR | 69 S1, 69 S4, 71 S1, 71 S3
Since these videos contain licensed content from LSAC, you'll have to have a paid account to access them. They're located on the same page as where you'd normally find the explanation videos. Easiest way to navigate to them is via the LG Explanation Page and scroll down (after you're logged in):
7sage.com/logic-game-explanations/
You probably want to check those out since they're earlier PTs and won't ruin your PTs for timed runs.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-2-passage-1-passage/
Couple of things noted:
—In the read, referring back to first paragraph/tying elements in later paragraphs back to intro
—Lots of tactile cues (pointing, emphatic circling, "air tracing" lines with pencil tip); plenty of this in the Q's as well as the read
—For passage part/term usage Q's, reading a few lines above/below
—Marking out the text of the AC's instead of just the letter
~3:30 for the read and an average of 30 seconds per Q, by my math, for a total of 7:07. Just want to note that a thorough/proper read encourages swiftness in the Q's—just like spending more time diagramming/drawing inferences in LG enables swiftness in the Q's.
Inspiring to see that it's humanly possible to do an fresh unseen rc/lr section within 20 mins
I would also check out PT37. There’s a great video of a high-scorer going through the test, skipping questions like a crazy person. It’s awesome. https://7sage.com/lesson/preptest-37-preface-to-live-commentary-videos/
Thanks @DumbHollywoodActor