I applied to law school before and didn't like how things were looking so I'm taking a year off to retake the LSAT and re-apply. Since I would ask at least one or two of the same people who wrote me letters of rec last year, should I reuse the ones they wrote me? Maybe change the date? Idk. Or tell them my predicament and ask if they can write a new one? Not much has changed in the last year so it's not like the letters would be all that different. Thanks!
Comments
1) Higher LSAT
2) New PS (seriously do it, it looks super lazy if you don't, you literally had a year)
3) Update your resume and get something more significant to add to it if possible
4) Changing out your LORs.
Now, if I were you I would definitely add an LOR. Either another teacher or an employer in the interim can at least give a bit of a freshness to your application. Ideally you want your second application to be consistent with the first, just stronger. So it makes sense if you use the same LORs, but if you can switch one out for a new one of equal strength, that's obviously better. If nobody is going to write you better LORs than you already have, then just get them to update it with a new date.
@sarkisp Many adcoms will absolutely pull your old file to see what you updated and also to get a feel for why they made their previous decision since they likely won't remember you, so the general recommendation is always to make a new one. The number of reapplicants per school is small enough that it's not a huge burden to do this in most cases. No sense getting dinged by a school for laziness.
I did already think about rewriting my personal statement. I didn't like my first one too much and I think I have something better to write about this time anyway.
I am adding a LOR too! Not much changed between me and my original LOR authors, but a lot did change in a year and I got more experience and an extra person to give me a recommendation.
Thanks again for all your sage advice!