I'm having what I think is a weird issue. I'm not doing well with the MP/MC questions but I seem to be doing ok with the other questions. Doesn't that seem odd? If I'm having trouble with the MP/MC questions how am I able to do the other question types? Isn't this question type the most important as far as LR questions? If you can't identify the argument how can you be successful with the other question types? I think my problem is that I can determine the main conclusion if the indicator words are there but not so much if they're not. So, I'm not getting many of the harder questions correct. I'm not doing so well with determining the premises, sub-conclusions, etc. I'm using Manhattan along with 7 Sage. Obviously I have more reviewing and studying to do, but what am I missing? I'm just not getting this question type. I'm taking September test so I still have time. It's just kind of frustrating. I've been studying off and on for the past year due to some major health issues. I'm just now getting back into really studying so I know I may just be rusty but I wasn't getting these questions right when I was studying hardcore. Any questions or thoughts?
Comments
Here is a list of transition indicators:
But
However
Although
Even though
On the other hand
Yet
Still
Nonetheless
Nevertheless
I can give you some examples from the June 2007 LSAT, since that one is downloadable for free.
June 2007 test, section II, question 1:
"But not all efforts to increase..."
The entire statement after "but" is the conclusion.
B is the correct answer choice because it is a restatement of the conclusion.
June 2007 test, section III, question 12:
"However, it is more likely that the similarity..."
The entire statement after "however" is the conclusion.
The answer D is a paraphrase of the conclusion.
This method should work 90% of the time. Just be careful when you have multiple transition indicators.
@Al [^-^d] same thing you said! Guess I am the "slow" one!