Do all method of reasoning questions contain flawed arguments? Or are there some valid arguments out there? I'm getting confused whether I'm suppose to look for the flaw or just how the argument functions as a whole or even BOTH. I'm not sure what kind of mindset to have for attacking method of reasoning questions.
Comments
That said, there can be valid arguments in MOR stimuli. That's why there are flawed MOR questions as well.
You want to think of these in the abstract. MOR questions are perfect candidates for prephrasing. Like @runiggyrun pointed out, they usually present the answers with a verb.
If they ask you to look for the method of reasoning, then look for the method of reasoning - what technique the individual uses to put forth their argument, how they present their argument, what they did to the other argument, etc.
I don't think I have ever seen a correct AC pertaining to the authors flaw on a MOR question. Again, that's why we have flawed MOR questions.