Hey 7Sagers, thanks for taking the time to read this and answer my conundrum. My issue is LGs; specifically - which boards to use and what the setup should look like. Unsurprisingly, if I can set the game up correctly I can answer any question choice. Even more so, if I know what type of logic game it is (during the 7sage course curriculum) I can usually get -2 questions per section. I tried JY's suggestion of repeating logic games with clean copies but when I repeat the game I remember the logic game and the board setup without fail - even after several days. This method has not helped me in improving PT logic games where I'ver never seen those games before; it's like my brain is learning by assigning a setup to specific variables and not the broader context of the game. What are some things that you guys can recommend to help sharpen my ability to decipher the games and to determine which boards should be used on games I've never seen before? My LG is my weakest area by far and it will be the key to increasing from my current 161 average to the upper 160s/low 170s that I'm aiming for. I'm very grateful for your suggestions.
Yours,
Comments
For instance, on multiple occasions J.Y. has used an In/Out set-up and labeled the game as such. However, for many of those same games, I used a grouping set-up. Both worked.
Sequencing games are easy. If they say something like "7 slots" and they give you 7 pieces, then ask you to use all pieces and sequence them, it's probably a one-layer sequencing game.
Grouping games can be tough. Go with your gut and use a board that would best represent all of the rules.
In/Out - again, simple. If they tell you to select among the pieces, it's probably an in-out game. If they tell you to select among the pieces and sequence them, it's probably an in-out sequencing game (you can also use a grouping board for these)
I say keep practicing but make sure you're not focusing on games by type. You want to practice all different types of games at once to force yourself to learn to adapt. Be prepared to struggle with it at first, it takes time to develop these skills!
@MrSamIam - That's good insight into how you approach the games. Sequencing ones and in/out games (After going through the curriculum) are clear for me. Honestly after looking at my analytics it looks like the real issue is grouping games, grouping games w/ a chart, and grouping games with sequencing games.
@RonSwanson -
I'm at the 2 month mark. Some of the inferences and especially in/out games have clicked for me but board setups make me freeze during PTs. How should I practice the games? If I've already done the games and can remember the setup how can I account for this?
Cheers to you both.
I'd recommend timing yourself on individual games and then working your way into full section LG drills. As far as games that you remember..I'd say put those aside and practice others until some time passes and you don't remember them as well.
I'd suggest buying the 10 Actuals series books if you haven't already. Those include PTs from a whole bunch of tests. There are also a bunch of books available on Amazon containing LGs.
Also, if you haven't already seen @Pacifico's LG attack strategy you should definitely check it out. https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/2737/logic-games-attack-strategy
It's a pretty awesome guide to help you get organized and develop a method to crush LG
Certain things should trigger a board when you are reading the stimulus. If you read "there are 6 people taking piano lessons Monday through Saturday" it should instantly trigger 6 slots. To confirm your board, I find it useful to then go hunting for things that wold eliminate variations or "twists" on the games (or confirm them.) Things like "1 max person per day" tells us there won't be a grouping element. Things like "all people have to have exactly one lesson" tells us that there won't be empty days or repeat lessons. These are things that believe me: if you do enough games, will become automatic!
The other broad category of games in my experience are unique games that don't easily lend themselves to boards from our previous experience. These are often a difficult hurdle for people. My experience has been that the key to these games is twofold: 1.Read the stimulus and the rules like for the next few minutes, it is the most important thing in the world. Unique games are difficult, but one thing we can't say is that they are unfair. A careful reading can go a long way to mitigate the difficulty of unique games. 2.Have enough time saved up to properly tackle these games during timed sections. The difficulty here is that we never really know what will come up next in the section, that is why (to paraphrase CS Lewis) "The schoolboy does not know what part of his Virgil lesson he will be made to translate. That is why he must be ready to translate any passage."
TL;DR: get great at games where a recognition of a familiar board or setup is rewarded, so you will have time to carefully, carefully read the games in which a board or setup might initially be difficult to ascertain or might not fit any pattern whatsoever. This comes with practice!