Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 33.4K All Categories
- 28K LSAT
- 17K General
- 5.2K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 70 Podcasts
- 193 Webinars
- 12 Scholarships
- 194 Test Center Reviews
- 2.1K Study Groups
- 111 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.5K Specific LSAT Dates
- 25 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 9 September 2024 LSAT
- 38 August 2024 LSAT
- 28 June 2024 LSAT
- 4 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 22 January 2024 LSAT
- 37 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5K Not LSAT
- 4K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 636 Technical Problems
- 285 Off-topic
Related Discussions
Back on track..where should I start?
Not Ralph Nader
Alum Member Inactive Sage Inactive ⭐
Hey guys, little background information, I studied for LSAT for six months during which I finished the syllabus, did couple of PT and did the Bundle that increased my score from below 148 (not timed) to 151(timed). But had to go back to uni for three months to get my GPA up. Now I am free and have until December to take the LSAT and need a 155-157 to get in. I will be studying for LSAT full time from now until December, I do not know where should I start? Should I finish the trainer, do a quick review of syllabus or start doing PTs and BR? I appreciate it if you could tell me what do you think.
Comments
Congrats on working on getting that GPA up. That shows a ton of commitment, which is always a valuable trait for those of us embarking on the arduous LSAT journey.
First, I would say to not set your goal at a date, but at a score. So you’ll want to aim for a 160+ so if you have an off day on the test, you’ll still be able to hit your target 155-157. I think the most harmful thing I see people do is set their LSAT date and then work towards it in lieu of setting a score and working towards that AND then sitting for the test. I promise you with enough work and time, you can absolutely hit a 157, or better! I actually recently just decided against taking in December because there would be no way I would feel ready. And it doesn’t make sense to rush through the material and put in all that work for a score you won’t be proud of, or one that isn’t your true target. Since then I’ve been a big advocate of the 7Sage philosophy of waiting until you are 100% ready. The best part is I am way less stressed and can focus on learning to defeat this beast of a test.
So what exactly do I think should be your next step?
I’d go through the core curriculum again and then use The LSAT Trainer to shore up any weaknesses. I find that LSATers in the low 150s are just missing a few significant skills (logic, argument structure, proper LG diagramming/inference making) that could raise their scores way up into the 160s. Really focus on hammering in those key fundamentals and I think you will be surprised how much your score will rise.
I don’t think you should do a “quick” review of the syllabus, but rather a thorough one. Having not studied for a few months, I am sure you’re a little rusty—and that’s to be expected.
PT’s are a finite treasure for us LSAT test takers. Don’t begin taking them until you are a master of all the fundamentals JY/Mike Kim go over in their lessons.
Just take your time and really learn them and you’ll be golden. You may want to take one to gauge where you're at and get a good read on your weaknesses.
Edited to add: Maybe we can get @allison.gill.sanford to host Office Hours in celebration of your return? Hint, Hint, lol
And yeah @"Alex Divine” , that’s exactly what happens! It’s weird. I absolutely despised the ACT, SAT, and GRE. But not the LSAT. I actually respect the LSAT. I feel like studying for it actually makes me smarter instead of just giving me a better test score. I recognize that there is actual value in what I’m learning. And JY certainly makes the curriculum way more enjoyable than anyone could expect.
I think you can start "easy" by re-doing one of the PT's you've done before to assess how much, if any, the break has impacted your standing. Pick one you've done a long time ago and you won't remember the answers, and take the score with a grain of salt, because it's likely to include an LG section you've already proofed, and that alone can push your score up significantly. The point of this PT would just be to assess how you "feel" about the questions. Do you still remember what to do when you see an NA question? Are flaws as clear as they were before? Are you struggling more to remember how to diagram an "unless" statement than you did before the break? Did you remember to check each answer for potential words that give it away as a trap?
If you conclude you haven't lost much ground, then you can proceed with your studies where you left them. If not, pay special attention to the skills that have gone rusty and focus on those first, either by revisiting the curriculum if they are fundamental skills, or by drilling if they are more "strategic" skills like identifying trap answers and skipping time sinkers.