(For newbies: this refers to Lesson 18 of Introduction to Logic Games & Sequencing Games)
Does "in time" refer to JY's estimate of the time required as shown with, and stated in, his explanation of the game? I can't think of any other time criterion to use, so:
Is there any reason I shouldn't use that estimate as a hard-and-fast rule, meaning that if I exceed it at all then I should re-do the game? I guess another and totally nerdy way of asking this is: are these estimates the mean of JY's subjective distribution of the time a -0 LG section scorer would take, or are they generous such they are comfortably to the right of that mean? If the former I could chalk up a minor exceedance to variance and move on; if the former I'd have to re-do.
I know this seems a nitpicking question, but I think it might make some difference to me as I'm just starting a rigorous 20-day push featuring 84 games of LG practice.
Comments
https://i.gyazo.com/e5e2b85960791d37ca84614db8608d55.png
...Although I suppose it'd not be a good idea to look at -- know -- the estimates before first doing a section of games.
I can put together a spread sheet this week if I have time.