It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Anyone notice a difference in difficulty between PT 70 and PT 71? I scored 6 points higher on PT 70 than 71. I know no test is objectively harder then than the other but man 71 kicked my ass.
Comments
I just took 71 and I thought that the LR was harder. Also, there were two rule substitution questions for LG.
The whole test was off for me. I usually do the worst in RC, moderate in LR, and best in LG. On PT71, I did best in RC, poorly in LG, and very poorly on LR. Not going to let it rattle me though.
I just looked at my analytics for these two test and both were right at my average. I got a 170 on PT70 and a 169 on PT71. They were pretty flat across the board for me as well, when it come to where I missed my questions.
I would say that PT 71 might have exposed a weakness you have in LR and LG. I would use this as an opportunity to grow! The entire point of a PT is to learn right? So if one test kicked your ass, you should be thinking something like;
Then blind review the hell out of the test. I'm glad to see you will not let it phase you! That's the right attitude to have!
Haha I actually did better on 71 vs 70 (+2 pts). Felt like a fairly average test to me. I agree with LSATcantwin above; I think this could be a case study of what you need to work on You want to make sure than no matter if you get a test like 70 or 71, you'll be able to handle it