Flaw in Reasoning mistaking a sufficient for being necessary and vice verca.

kwoods15 · August 2013

What does this flaw look like? Can someone point me to a certain PT or example?

CJ Shin · August 2013

Check out PT59 Section3 Q22.

This is a sufficiency-necessary confusion flaw taken to its extreme, and also a rare question that asks for double flaws. Always watch out for any sufficiency-necessary indicators in the stimulus and see if they try to do anything with it. But bear in mind that the harder ones cover them very well with heavy usage of abstract language and confusing sentence structures.

kwoods15 · August 2013

thanks

Luis89011 · September 2013

PT 64 Sec 1 Q24

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

Related Discussions

Flaw in Reasoning mistaking a sufficient for being necessary and vice verca.

Is Confusing Necessary for Sufficient the Contrapositive for Confusing Sufficient for Necessary?Hey everybody! I've been thinking about this for a while, and I just re-watched the video on Contrapositive Mistakes, which has cemented my feelin…

How did my GPA go from a 3.8 in college, a 3.9 in uni...to a 3.7 in LSAC??I finished community college with by GPA a little over a 3.8. I now have a bit over a 3.9 after a year in the university I transferred to. LSAC proce…

Necessary for sufficient vs. sufficient for necessary?Is there any difference between the two? If there is, could anyone give an example of how that would look? For example: Premise: A->B Conclus…

Looking for a Study Buddy for the LSAT in December in the CLE.If you happen to be in the CLE area and would be willing to partner with me to study and help up both our scores (I currently score around 155, plus …

Is there a function in the 7Sage Analytics to search for a "cookie cutter" flaw answer choice?I just finished my first pretest after completing the CC and I have jumped up 18 points in my LSAT score. Needless to say, I am super stoked to see t…

Comments