I did not take a PT before the curriculum but I have gradually improved after the course. My first PT after the core curriculum was a 167 and I have recently scored as high as a 180 with a PT average of 175 over my last 5 PTs. The course teaches you…
@canihazJD said:
Focus on speed/flow through games. Just like the rest of the sections, the time you bank at for another round at the end is where you pick up those last points.
Thanks for the advice. I will try to go through them faster so …
People with your numbers have a great shot at a large scholarship from Columbia. Probably not worth EDing unless you're fine paying sticker and don't want to go anywhere else.
@goforbroke
Maybe you're onto something. I have done 5 full PTs now as well as the cc and multiple problem sets. Maybe once you have enough data it changes to target times under the vids. I would still like to change it back to J.Y's suggestions i…
@"Theo --Student Service--" said:
@173orbust said:
For logic game explanation vids they are now showing a computed "target time" instead of the old suggested time bench marks that used to be there. For example, for one game he says…
Is that 178 a typo and meant to be 168? If not, why do you think you scored so much higher on PT 36 than PTs 38 and 40. Had you seen sections/questions in it before taking it? Also, you'd probably be pretty close to your goal if you got LG to -0. Pe…
Thanks for the advice guys. I did not realize that there were sections for drilling at the end of the CC anyway. I will be doing all of the problem sets and keeping a wrong answer journal.
While it is a personal decision, I would strongly consider retaking given that you think you can do better on the LSAT. This could open many doors to you with more acceptances or scholarship money.