Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
leoxnardx
About
- Username
- leoxnardx
- Joined
- Visits
- 9
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
What is the theory that is not adequately accounted for? The "theory' in AC C seems to be something that the question stem does not talk about. We dont know if the invisible spectrum theory "adequately account" for anything, we just know that relati…
-
@Ravinder said: I think I messaged everyone in that asked for the checklist with my email so that I can email the the checklist but let me know if I missed someone. Another key thing I would recommend is a simple system for skipping questions.…
-
Hey I had a similar problem with C, and I made a discussion post a day or two ago with my take on this question. Would you mind taking a look at that and either see if it makes sense or add some more to my interpretation of it? Thanks hope that can …
-
Hey I got both 23 and 22 wrong, and better yet, I randomly picked one for 22 and picked B for 23 just like you did. for 23, B is wrong on the ground of "many complex causes." The sociologists are just saying that there "cannot be one simple cause."…
-
Hey did you happen to get question 22 right? I have no idea why that should be E nor I understand what that means.
-
A states that the invisible light spectrum would not adequately explain the phenomenon. Conclusion: there is no reason to believe this to be the case premise: Einstein's relativity COMPLETELY explains this phenomenon Let's negate A. We get invis…
-
@gaver456 said: Hi! For this one I did "/poorly promoted --> so." Then, I did "/so" and concluded "/properly promoted." I changed "/poorly promoted" to "properly promoted." While in most questions that's not advisable, I feel like for thes…
-
Hey I think the problem with AC D is that the comparative part. From the passage, I dont think we can comfortably infer that either method of bankruptcy law can lead to discharging more proportion of debts. Yes, as you said, there might be more peop…
-
I think the answer can be directly answered in the sentence right after the highlighted part. The passage states that the non-American methods have an intensity in pursuing maximizing economic benefits, making these methods unsuitable for preservati…
-
@bella900 said: I will also quickly add that another reason A is wrong (and this is also why it's so important to read answer choices carefully!) because is states "in the face of evidence" - but there is NO evidence suggesting that below-aver…
-
For 17, I eliminated B on the basis that the argument doesn't present evidence that states the instruction quality hasn't increase. The argument is that because last year, only one-third were able to pass the test. Therefore the curriculum is workin…
-
For 19, I chose A cuz I had a very hard time understanding the question and the argument under time constraint. Came back to it picked one that I knew had problem. The argument is that the productivity growth in INDUSTRIALIZED NATIONS has dropped s…
-
@Ashley2018 said: I think that's a decent paraphrase and yeah...the author should have been asking precisely that instead of just rushing to the conclusion that everybody else in the field was just out to get him. Imagine writing a paper about…
-
I eliminated D very quickly under time. What does paper, metal, glass have to do with the argument? Saw these three and clicked the x right away and didn't even read and chose B. D weakens it because what we know from the passage is that the propor…
-
Very very tricky question, and I got it wrong. But here is how i figured it out. For traditional knowledge, we know that feudalism presupposes the existence of nobility. In lawgic, that is Feudalism --> Nobility. Presuppose = require. According …
-
@Ashley2018 said: C is saying that...maybe the scientists are just trying to provide evidence that would bring us closer to the truth...all because what they've found so far contradict's Smith's work. That's it. ok I might be dumb. I have no…
-
I think the number method mentioned above is one way, but I'm terrible with numbers so here is my answer to why D is better than B. I chose B under time, and now I kinda see why not. B states that the evaluation system disadvantages some, leading t…
-
I chose C as well. Upon reviewing I think the problem with C is that the main intention for holding elected office can still be money even though the pay varies. I overlooked the fact that being "paid poorly" does not rule out the possibility that t…
-
@Ashley2018 said: The issue with the argument is the author concluding that the papers published by scientists were written as part of a conspiracy to discredit Professor S. (They're all out to get this Professor Smith!) But maybe they really …
-
This question is basically a number game. So we know that the definition of obesity here is not absolute or about BMI; it's relative, and only those who are more obese than the 85% are classified as obese. So lets say there are 1000 children. The 15…
-
@Ashley2018 said: So...do you need help with this question lol? actually yes. I'd love a second opinion on AC E. I think the logic for taking it out is that it doesn't fit into the argument, and it misinterprets the intention of what the cit…
-
@LivinLaVidaLSAT said: @lekSAT__ said: is this rill I chuckled from just reading the title because I didn't anticipate this topic appearing on the test. I've never seen this question before. This PT is from 1992 so subject …
-
@lekSAT__ said: is this rill what is rill wtf
-
me me
-
I agree with the explanation above. I got this question wrong just by thinking that we don't have information about climate fluctuation. However, we know that the eggshells decomposing rate, the thing the scientists use to determine age, depends on …
-
Ok I know this is like 4+ years ago but I was doing it and figured it out so I'll add on to the answer. The struggle was between B and D. Let's look at the passage. Basically the biologist is saying that IF deforestation continues at this rate (DC)…
-
I think the key to the question is "increase readership." Who are these readers? Are these current readers? No these are potential readers that are not currently sub to the journal, and the change in format is trying to get these potential readers o…