Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
lschoolgo
About
- Username
- lschoolgo
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,018
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
yeah, but it's a 2-star for 72/77 LG. That's too low and same as same of the easiest LG in recent history for PT-69 and PT-71 LG. How many average misses make for a 2-star, 3 star, 4-star and 5-star respectively? Can 7sage have a way to see the s…
-
why can't you use laptop webcam? I use my laptop webcam to record all the timed sections I take.
-
It'd be amazing if a guru could do such a video with never-before-seen PT-77 RC/LR. Inspiring to see that it's humanly possible to do an fresh unseen rc/lr section within 20 mins
-
yes, RC has become harder to score high on in recent PTs unless one scores perfect in it almost consistently.
-
it's easier to simply have the previous scoring be retrievable as you can't note what you answered for every question @LSATKingsman said: Is there anyway we can add a grader to the problem set sections? @lschoolgo said: add scorin…
-
i think LR has changed 70s and has gotten more subtle and less formal.
-
Related to the grader, is there a way to add scoring for retake of a PT without deleting the original score sheet?
-
@"J.Y. Ping" said: PrepTest C 2? Any chance that LSAC will be releasing more February/undisclosed tests? They haven't released any Feb tests after year 2000 except II-C
-
Can you describe your approach to "drilling" how were you able to do like 14 PTs (66-76, A, B, june pt) in the week before the test, and how were your scores on these? @ChoboPie said: ChoboPie Memb…
-
The choice clearly mentions that they had "lower pre-program" achievement, which strongly suggests they were not as good as those who completed when beginning the program. This provides an alternate explanation of why those who completed ended up se…
-
B also informs us about those who successfully completed the program: if those who completed had better pre-program achievement than those who didn't, then it supports the idea that those who completed were naturally high achievers and didn't become…
-
I agree that it's a sufficient assumption not necessary. I wasted extra time on this q when saw no answer choice that was a NA but this question seems flawed.
-
well, what you are saying is contradictory. "why it's sophisticated" alone isn't an independent clause. if you're combining it with another clause "is because it's intelligible”, then you're simply winging your explanation. you then can't combine "i…
-
So the stim is: "One reason why euro music has had strong influence, and why it's sophisticated, is because it's intelligible" "And" separates the clause from the first one, but both "it's because it's intelligible" and "one reason" apply to both …
-
Not really. "One reason" applies to both why European music has had influence, and why it's sophisticated.
-
@c.janson35 that's not really "the bar for sophistication" per the stim. Stim is only saying that being intelligible when independent of its original function is "a" reason for sophistication of Euro music. That could hold true and you can still …
-
these are available only in a course option. is there a free video of recent RC being done live?
-
the questions that you saw "removed from scoring" are most likely the ones that were removed before PT/scores were released. this can happen due to 2 reasons. one, lsac removed it themselves because despite passing when used in experimental in pr…
-
Your drop in 70s tests will most likely be less than the drop in pt 72, so take that first to get the worst case estimate
-
Lsac will never admit (after they have released scores and the PT) that a Q was flawed. admitting it means readjusting scores for tens of thousands and liability which is near impossible to manage. even if they screwed up, they will use and fall ba…
-
pt-72 amongst recent PTs.
-
that one negative review of USF was enough for me to lose confidence in it. @msizzleee may be things have changed in USF about the desk size, but one review mentions tiny desks. could some rooms have long desks and some others not? i don't know mu…
-
you can still change your test center. SJ
-
USF has both terrrible and good review at http://lsatcenters.wikia.com/ Anyone know about this test center? SAMUEL MERRITT UNIV - HEALTH EDUC CTR OAKLAND, CA MARRIOTT WALNUT CREEK WALNUT CREEK, CA
-
@msizzleee said: Hey there, I'm in the Bay Area and man, am I bummed that SCU isn't a testing center anymore. However, I just took the October test at USF and it wasn't so bad. They had about 10 of us in an small classroom and spaced us out well.…
-
notice how the bubble row for the BR duplicates itself to allow one to enter the BR response. something similar can be done for PT bubble sheet, one only needs to duplicate/replicate the PT bubble sheets. @nicole.hopkins said: That's quite an assum…
-
Nice!... when is the entering bubbles for multiple takes going to be enabled? It seems it should be easy to enable.
-
But how can one enter take-2 for a PT without erasing the old bubble sheet? It is useful to have a way to store bubbles for multiple takes of a pt.
-
Really need this feature for multiple takes of a PT.
-
@kennedybj you should file a complaint so that it's on the record.