Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
FaviPapi-1-1
About
- Username
- FaviPapi-1-1
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,194
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
You take a week to process the undertaking and, then, another week to process the amount of points you are aiming for and how hard that will be... After those two weeks, you should be good to start studying again
-
Overall, I tackle such questions by asking myself the obvious: which answer must be true. The way I got about it is by reading actively and critically in the aim of understanding and comprehending what I read from the stimulus. With experience, you…
-
Happy Monday! Thank. you for taking the time to write back to me. I will select a person in a day or so from now. If you do not hear from me but have some specific or general questions, please message me. I will do my best to answer them in a promp…
-
When I feel that way, I take a week off and do other stuff such as going out with friends and family members. Once that week is over, I retake the parts that I flagged (such as difficult arguments, games, or passages) of the past 10 PTs and evaluate…
-
I think you are overthinking it... While some not covers 0-99, it doesn't carry the same connotation when said in the sentence, some cats are not pretentious. Such sentence means that there are some cats that are not pretentious; in other words, i…
-
Let's say we have the following statement: Most Xs are Ys. How can we deny it? Uhm, we can say this, Most Xs are not Ys. Similarly, let's say we have the following statement: None of Xs are Y. How can we deny it? Uhm, we can say this, Some Xs ar…
-
The conclusion is not what you have but rather this: chance of elect. -> Und E Do you see the flaw? In short the flaw is that the author takes this statement, Und E -->/support NT, to be this statement, /support NT -> Und E. This is a co…
-
Abstractly, the argument is as follows: X -> Y Z Therefore X -> Z This is wrong because we don't know how big the Y group is in comparison to the X group. Here is quick way to see why the conclusion doesn't follow from the premises: Let'…
-
Hey bud, On PT65-S4-Q12, largely means "most." I think it depends on the context. On that question, it means most; however, if I say that the group is large, we don't know how large... Good luck
-
Theoretically, yes: that could happen... As you may know, an argument can have multiple flaws. However, I think I need to see a question that describes such an argument. The more I think about it, the more I go against my answer above! Hahaha
-
Here is quick example that might help explain the difference between SA and NA "Tom is smart; therefore, he will be intelligent and intuitive." SA: the answer must connect the premise to the conclusion SA: fast --> intelligent and intuitive N…
-
Here is my quick answer: Once you have done a few sets and feel comfortable, move on to something else since, even if you can get them 90 percent of the time, that would just give you 1 or 2 points out of 25/26. Moreover, I do believe that there i…
-
It's the first one: (i) If you are having trouble diagraming it, then perhaps you can negate the sufficient part, which would be the portion before the word "unless," rather than taking the word "unless" to mean "if not"... In other words: "~A un…
-
Here is my quick answer: Conditionality is all about absolute rules... That said, even though we have trigger words such as “only,” there are still “exceptions.” So, when I read your two examples, I thought: “well, that’s interesting...” For the s…
-
You aren't too far away from such high... To be honest, it's hard to say what would help you unless I know which questions you are getting wrong. So, that said, my quick answer would be the following: LR: Do you really understand the logic or infer…
-
Diagram 1: A -----> B ---most---> C From Diagram 1, we cannot come up with any proper inferences. The reason to that is the following: we do not know how big the B group is... Let's say there are 10 people in the A group, and all those 10 pe…
-
I think you should do whatever works for you. If you can do 4 sections, then that's amazing. If you can do a 3 sections, then that's great. From what you wrote, you seem to know the benefits of doing 4 sections, but then is such benefits warranted? …
-
No. He means re-do the games and use your past experience with it to improve: 1. the diagraming 2. the inferences 3 the questions
-
It seems like you are trying to find "shortcuts." If that is the case, then you shouldn't since the LSAT is not a standard exam in its particular content so to speak. You should learn the ins and outs of a rule such as when the word "unless" is used…
-
I can't really tailor a good advise unless you provide more details about what you know of such a question type... Moreover, I can't give you a generic response either because there are different types of assumptions and the "what follows if this is…
-
Here is quick answer: review all your past work. LG/RC/LR: redo the challenging games and make sure your method is great... Other than that, take just one PT in between the month, and BR it.
-
I'll be down to discuss logical reasoning questions (as long as they are not in PT that I have not taken): full explanations and fastest way to solve them. Also, if anything, I would probably commit once a week.
-
In my opinion, it all depends on your timing. If they are easier, then try aiming for a higher score... Here is an objection: just because they are easier (at least feel easier) doesn't mean you will get more questions correctly than what are deemed…
-
I would be down to answer some of your logical reasoning question (unless those questions are from PT's I haven't taken) through zoom. Welcome to shoot me a message. Good luck studying Luxxe_JD
-
Hi, I think it is the fourth question in section 3 of PT 64, right? Also, the error, if formally said, is not an illegal reversal but an illegal negation. Assuming it's that question, I think it's interesting that I didn't think of the error that …
-
Hi Poornima, I have the Manhattan 5lb book, and, even though it is insightful and helpful, I haven't really used it; however, it might be what you are looking for... In terms of drilling questions, I recommend just doing 10 consecutive PTs, breaki…
-
If I were you, I would try to do the first passage, the first game and the first 5 questions of one of two logical reasoning sections. After that, I will look at JY's explanations and compare them with yours. If you blind review is way off, then st…
-
I think this happens to everyone. The best way to avoid such a situation is learn from previous similar situations. The reasons I am usually down to two answer choices are the following: I misread the answer choice I misread the question/stimulus …
-
Anytime bud - if you have any other question, you can shoot me a message; good luck studying.
-
Here is my tip for MSS: Procedure: These questions ask you to pick an answer that gets most support from the stimulus. It is not a MBT; hence, such questions are more laid back or so to speak... PROCEDURE: A. Read the stimulus (without annotatio…