Is it at all of interest to admissions that the first 1/2 of my GPA came from 1989-1992 and the last half came 2012-2014? I'd much rather they weigh heavily the fact that I am a TOTALLY different person now than I was back then.
... were formed on Earth about 2.9 billion years ago. These diamonds ... oxygen in Earth's atmosphere 2.9 billion years ago, then not ... oxygen in Earth's atmosphere 2.9 billion years ago.
@c.janson35 said:
No amount of studying, undergrad school ranking, or undergradGPA entitles you to a high score. The only thing you can do is to keep plugging along!
... . It's true that only undergradGPA (specifically LSAC calculated) matters for ... , note any trends in your undergradGPA. Did you nail your last ...
Following. I am also interested how graduate work impacts the admissions equation. Personally, I have a few units from multiple schools at the graduate level, but no degree. My undergradGPA is alright 3.81, but my grad is better 3.93.
... />
> Cumulative GPA2.7
> Degree GPA 4.0 GPA off due to immaturity ... positive improvement on your GPA, schools still have to ... report the LSAC GPA. They can't acknowledge ... off of your LSAC GPA, which hurts their numbers ...
> @LSATcantwin said:
> (by super splitter I mean 2.7 cumulative GPA, 4.0 degree gpa, and a roughly 169-170 LSAT)
>
wow that really sucks... such a significant drop :(