> @akistotle said:
> I once tried to make a list of all the common flaws.....But then I gave up. :sweat: So here is a partial list:
>
> **5) Causation confusions (correlation-causation flaws)**
> PT20.S1.Q10; ...
... else have trouble with PT 65 in particular? I've scored ... those hovering around a +24/+22. I'm working on improving ... or 50's, but PT 65 is so recent that I ... an off test with PT 65 in particular? How do I ...
... . The corresponding raw scores were 74, 69, 71, 70, and 73 ... others where I go 18/28. LR is another weird one ... around, I've done PTs 39-46 so far, and I ...
... 3, Game 4
PT 22: Game 1, Game 2, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 28: Game 1, Game 2, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 29: Game 1, Game 2, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 30: Game 1, Game 2, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 31: Game 1, Game 2, Game ...
... 1950 at the age of 29. He went on to have ... . However, 7sage says they're 29-37 on US News in the ... changed so dramatically in only 68 years that I may as ... is 11 and PennState is 74! I mean, University of Pennsylvania ...
... LG for PTs up to 39 (at least the ones I ... one, I fall apart (PT 74 I went -8 on LG ... recent ones, also PTs 60 - 65, and then most of 40 ... then the LG from 60-65 throughout the next 10 days ...
... I mean: Diagraming conditionals: PT 36 Section 1 question 11. Before ... should take no more than 30-35 seconds. At the end ... that can do 35-1-22 by not diagramming it. I ... can answer the question in 28 seconds. 39 seconds with a rigorous ...
... . I started with 36, but definitely did not do 37 next. I ... would do 36, then 50, then do like 37, then 68, 69, back ... down to 45, then to 74, etc ...