Main Point question, I agonize between B and E. B is wrong because they never said it was not the only factor? But isn't E wrong as well because the conclusion was about unlikely that a prediction will occur where as E said probably will not? Isn't E ...
Can someone please help me understand why this is A. How does this strengthen the argument that Han purple was discovered by accident?
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-1-question-17/
So happy to say that!! I'm feeling really good. My diagnostic was a 153. I've taken about 35 PTs. My last three were all 167s. If I get within +or- 3 of that I'm going to be stoked. 163 is the 75th percentile for my school :)
... every single test 1-35 and BR thoroughly and ... then move forward to 35+," but I realize this ... />
-Use PT 15-30 to drill timed sections, slowly ... then move forward with PTing 35+? This is especially relevant ... all games from 1-35 and drilling the other ...
I'm stumped on 18. I set my diagram up to have my shelves numbered horizontically and JY sets his up vertically. I got all of the other questions right but I just couldn't figure out 18. Can it just be a coincidence that I got the other questions right and ...
I;m sorry I read the explanation, it still makes no sense to me how A has anything to do with the lines referred to. To me C look like the best answer because it is giving tribute to the ancestors and it involves ...
... on fool proofing games 1-35 using Pacifico's amazing LG ... plan to finish the 1-35 games by the end of ... me, particularly one that includes 36-75 and mixes them up ... you guys recommend progression from 36 to 75, I'm fine ...
Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks!
I don't see how D is incorrect. E is obviously correct, but how is D wrong?
Professor V's book is getting people riled up over the origins of glassblowing (really exciting stuff). If V is right, then there would be not enough evidence to ...